Thursday, June 28, 2012

Supreme Court upholds obamacare


Heritage Action: Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare: How Will We Respond? Having trouble viewing this email?
If you are
reading this, you need to enable images in your email program. Press view images or display images.
Repeal Obamacare.
Sam,
America's system of checks and balances ensures the Supreme Court's misguided decision will not be the final word on President Obama's government takeover of healthcare.
>> Read more of our response to this ruling at our website.
We still oppose Obamacare, and conservatives are still united around fully repealing President Obama's government takeover of our health care system. Today's decision is not the end of the fight, it is the beginning!
Sincerely,

Michael A. Needham
Chief Executive Officer
Heritage Action for America
If you are
reading this, you need to enable images in your email program. Press view images or display images.

Heritage Action for America | 214 Massachusetts Avenue NE, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20002
This message was intended for: skegley@columbus.rr.com | Learn more

Central vs. Local Government and lawyers

Lawyers-

The education of lawyers require a lot; however, I am unsure that it qualifies them to be most of our representatives in Congress or in the Judiciary.  I guess I have to concede on the Judiciary.  We currently have many lawyers in congress, all lawyers in Judiciary, and a pseudo-lawyer as PUSA.  We have obtained the obamacare thing, very unpopular with us people, pushed through by PUSA, and now somewhat endorsed by the Supreme Court.  I just wonder if the SC. justices should not be called criminal lawyers, as in lawyers who commit crimes of the highest order.

The Civil War was about more than anti-slavery differences.  It was about centralized vs local control of our country.  Long hours of study should not rule out common sense in this republic.  Common sense often  gets to and clarifies points much more effectively.

No, the current decisions against Arizona and for obamacare should not be crammed down the throats of the electorate.  By law, they definitely are. The lawyers are getting things wrong!