Thanks Dr. Pappas for your quick reply re: "Aspartame Poisoning" False!

Dr. Pappas,




Thanks for your quick reply. I appreciate your perspective and that is exactly why I forward these messages to you.



To whom it may concern: Dr. tom Pappas was our family doctor for several years here in Westerville before he retired a few years ago.



With email there is a caveat emptor factor of which we each must stay aware.



Sam





----- Original Message -----

From: Tom Pappas

To: Sam Kegley

Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:42 PM

Subject: Sweet Poison!!!!! FALSE





Sam - I read your article with interest since I have 3 members of my family with MS, and I drink nothing but diet sodas, etc. I have prescribe the same for my diabetic and overweight patients. I looked at several medical websites and could find no mention of what you sent below. I did find several articles that refute that Aspartame has any such ill effects and has been deemed safe by the FDA. I have added one article from the esteemed British medical journal, The Lancet.

Tom













Aspartame and the Internet



The following letter appeared in The Lancet on 3 July 1999. It is reproduced here with the permission of the publishers of this respected journal.



Sir - Patients at our diabetes clinic have raised concerns about information on the internet about a link between the artificial sweetener aspartame and various diseases. Our research revealed over 6000 web sites that mention aspartame, with many hundreds alleging aspartame to be the cause of multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosis, Gulf War Syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, brain tumours, and diabetes mellitus, among many others. Virtually all of the information offered is anecdotal, from anonymous sources and is scientifically implausible.



Aspartame, a dipeptide composed of phenylalanine and aspartic acid linked by a methyl ester bond, is not absorbed, and is completely hydrolysed in the intestine to yield the two constituent amino acids and free methanol. Opponents of aspartame suggest that the phenylalanine and methanol so released are dangerous. In particular, they assert that methanol can be converted to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, and thus cause metabolic acidosis and neurotoxicity.



Although a 330 ml can of aspartame-sweetened soft drink will yield about 20 mg methanol, an equivalent volume of fruit juice produces 40 mg methanol, and an alcoholic beverage about 60-100 mg. The yield of phenylalanine is about 100 mg for a can of diet soft drink, compared with 300 mg for an egg, 500 mg for a glass of milk, and 900 mg for a large hamburger (1). Thus, the amount of phenylalanine or methanol ingested from consumption of aspartame is trivial, compared with other dietary sources. Clinical studies have shown no evidence of toxic effects and no increase in plasma concentrations of methanol, formic acid, or phenylalanine with daily consumption of 50 mg/kg aspartame (equivalent to 17 cans of diet soft drink daily for a 70 kg adult) (1, 2).



The anti aspartame campaign purports to offer an explanation for illnesses that are prominent in the public eye. By targeting a manufactured chemical agent, and combining this with pseudo-science and selective reporting, the campaign makes complex issues deceptively simple. Sensational web site names (eg, aspartamekills.com) grab the browser's attention and this misinformation is also widely disseminated via chat groups and chain e-mail.



People consult the internet about medical issues for various reasons and many users regard online sources as being authoritative and valid. The medical profession has a role in teaching our patients to be discriminating consumers of the information offered there.



Anthony Zehetner, Mark McLean



Department of Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital,

Sydney NSW 2145, Australia



On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Sam Kegley wrote:





Now, You made me cry, Lou- (kidding ;( ). I am diabetic. Processed Sugar is not good for me. Aspertame is a sugar substitute. Is there a safe sugar substitute?



This is an interersting article, but has it been tested by the scientific method and blind block studies?



Does anybody know?



Sam





----- Original Message -----

From: luis flores


Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:52 PM

Subject: Sweet Poison!!!!! A Must Read













THIS IS THE ARTICLE ABOUT THE STUFF IN DIET DRINKS AND SUGAR SUBSTITUTE.



I am passing this on--didn't write it though.( I did read somewhere else that Sweet and Low is dangerous in the past few weeks.)