This, YET-ANOTHER ATROCITY of CREEPING ISLAMIZATION AGAINST AMERICA, comes courtesy of PATRIOTS Loel & Bud.
Ski: TAKE NOTE of this TRUTH and CLEAR YOUR FOGGED MIND!!!!!
O'D
Loel said:
This is what is happening to our country. Do you see anything wrong with this? I do. Our children are being brainwashed to accept Islam. This is directly the act of this administration. This complete school administration (Joshua Frank, Bella Wong) should have been fired. It is time for America to wake up!!!
Subject: Video - Public School 6th graders praying at mosque!
Video shows public school students on field trip praying at a mosque!
Please click here [url: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7-I9Qp3d4Y&feature=player_embedded ] to view a shocking video that contains footage of a May 2010, 6th grade public school field trip to a Boston mosque. (See background story below.)
The video, released by Americans for Peace and Tolerance reveals, among other things, students participating in Muslim prayer—and not a single teacher objecting or trying to stop it!
Brigitte Gabriel has been warning Americans about inappropriate and potentially unlawful activities that promote Islam in our public schools. Last December we told you about a furor that erupted in an Indiana elementary school where students were being prepped to sing a song praising Allah during the “winter festival.”
Please forward this email to everyone you know!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
School Trip to “Moderate” Mosque: Inside Video Captures Kids Bowing to Allah
Wednesday, 15 September 2010 23:35
http://www.peaceandtolerance.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=129:
school-trip-to-moderate-mosque-inside-video-captures-kids-bowing-to-allah&catid=7:
our-statements&Itemid=39
Today, Americans for Peace and Tolerance released a video showing 6th graders from LEFTIST/PROGRESSIVE Wellesley, MA as they rise from prostrating themselves alongside Muslim men in a prayer to Allah while on a [May 2010] public school field trip to the largest mosque in the Northeast. Teachers did not intervene. Parents have not been told.
The video was taken inside the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center – Boston’s controversial Saudi-funded mega-mosque (VICTORY MOSQUE) – during a Wellesley Middle School social studies trip to the mosque, ostensibly taken to learn about the history of Islam first-hand. [O'D NOTE: These kids could LEARN ALL THEY NEED ABOUT the POLITICAL IDEOLOGY CALLED ISLAM on the WEB!!!] Yet the video reveals that the students are being blatantly mis-educated about Islam. A mosque spokesperson (a head-covered, shroud-wearing woman) is seen teaching the children that in Mohammed’s 7th century Arabia women were allowed to vote, while in America women only gained that right a hundred years ago. This seems to be an increasingly recurring theme in American schools – the denigration of western civilization and the glorification of Islamic history and values. In fact, just recently, the American Textbook Council revealed that the New York State high school regents exam whitewashes the atrocities that occurred during the imperialistic Islamic conquest of Christian Byzantium, Persia, the African continent, and the Indian subcontinent, even as it demonizes European colonialism in South America.
The mosque spokesperson also taught the students that the only meaning of Jihad in Islam is a personal spiritual struggle, and that Jihad historically has had no relationship with holy war. As far as we know, the school has not corrected these false lessons.
For the past three years we’ve been sounding the alarm about the radical leadership and Saudi funding of the Boston mega-mosque and the organization that runs it, the Muslim American Society, which has been labeled by Federal prosecutors as “the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.”
The Islamic Society of Boston was founded by Abdulrahman Alamoudi, who is currently serving 23 years in jail on terror charges. For years, its board of trustees included Yusuf al Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood who was banned by Bill Clinton from the United States in 1999. Qaradawi now chairs the Muslim American Society’s university, which offers classes inside the mosque. Over half the mosque’s $15.5 million price tag was funded by wealthy Saudis and since it opened, several of its leaders, donors and members have been implicated in Islamic extremism.
Oussama Ziade, a big donor to the mosque, is now a fugitive in Lebanon after being indicted in 2009 for dealing in the assets of an Al Qaeda financier. Ahmad Abousamra, the son of the Boston Muslim American Society’s former vice-president Abdulbadi Abousamra, is now a fugitive in Syria, fleeing the country before being indicted in 2009 on charges of aiding Al Qaeda. One of the mosque’s imams, Abdullah Faaruuq, was captured on tape in 2010 telling followers to “pick up the gun and the sword” and to defend another local terrorist Aafia Siddiqui from the U.S. government. Siddiqui, who was one of the imam’s congregants, is an MIT graduate and Al Qaeda member awaiting sentencing for attempting to murder FBI agents in Afghanistan while shouting “death to America.”
The mosque leadership continues to be embraced by top Massachusetts political and religious leaders. These include Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, as well as a group of local progressive rabbis and Christian clergy, who all insist despite evidence to the contrary that the mosque is moderate and its critics are just bigots.
Indeed, this is a familiar [ALINSKYITE] refrain by leaders nationwide in response to the increasing public realization that Islamic leaders are not as moderate as they present themselves. Radicalism is growing and many "moderate" Muslims have been silenced. In various parts of the country, public schools are allowing Muslim extremists to promote Islam to our children. Something’s broken here. Our leadership is failing. It’s now up to ordinary citizens to fix it.
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Jack P and our politicians in America
Would that you weren't right on, Jack. I have good friends that won't admit the errors of their o vote in 2008. I say we are in a civil war and the mafia is on the side of the liberals.
Sam
Sam , I am truly fearful that these elitest politicians( all parties) and the complacent electorate have, already stolen or bargained away our future. Nobody seems willing to make the tough choises that might, possible save us. If some were to arise with a workable program of salvation,They'd be strung up or laughed out of the country. Future history books will show 1776-20?? as a time when the human race could have saved itself and declined the offer. Turning 83 and looking from the short side ain't so bad.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Sam Kegleywrote:
Wow, Jack and James!
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists) for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC! Free these slaves to be deported and free our future generations of Americans for this still great country!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack H Plymale
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
Sam
Sam , I am truly fearful that these elitest politicians( all parties) and the complacent electorate have, already stolen or bargained away our future. Nobody seems willing to make the tough choises that might, possible save us. If some were to arise with a workable program of salvation,They'd be strung up or laughed out of the country. Future history books will show 1776-20?? as a time when the human race could have saved itself and declined the offer. Turning 83 and looking from the short side ain't so bad.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Sam Kegley
Wow, Jack and James!
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists) for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC! Free these slaves to be deported and free our future generations of Americans for this still great country!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack H Plymale
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
Trivia... thanks to Joann Hensley- wonderful math instructor at CSCC
And for you trivia buff, here's some education...
These are some trivial things to know ...
1. Q: Why are many coin banks shaped like pigs?
A: Long ago, dishes and cookware in Europe were made of a dense orange clay called 'pygg'. When people saved coins in jars made of this clay, the jars became known as 'pygg banks.' When an English potter misunderstood the word, he made a bank that resembled a pig. And it caught on.
2. Q: Did you ever wonder why dimes, quarters and half dollars have notches, while pennies and nickels do not?
A: The US Mint began putting notches on the edges of coins containing gold and silver to discourage holders from shaving off small quantities of the precious metals. Dimes, quarters and half dollars are notched because they used to contain silver. Pennies and nickels aren't notched because the metals they contain are not valuable enough to shave..
3. Q: Why do men's clothes have buttons on the right while women's clothes have buttons on the left?
A: When buttons were invented, they were very expensive and worn primarily by the rich. Because wealthy women were dressed by maids, dressmakers put the buttons on the maid's right.! Since most people are right-handed, it is easier to push buttons on the right through holes on the left. And that's where women's buttons have remained since.
4. Q. Why do X's at the end of a letter signify kisses?
A: In the Middle Ages, when many people were unable to read or write, documents were often signed using an X. Kissing the X represented an oath to fulfill obligations specified in the document. The X and the kiss eventually became synonymous.
5. Q: Why is shifting responsibility to someone else called 'passing the buck'?
A: In card games, it was once customary to pass an item, called a buck, from player to player to indicate whose turn it was to deal. If a player did not wish to assume the responsibility, he would 'pass the buck' to the next player.
6. Q: Why do people clink their glasses before drinking a toast?
A: It used to be common for someone to try to kill an enemy by offering him a poisoned drink. To prove to a guest that a drink was safe, it became customary for a guest to pour a small amount of his drink into the glass of the host. Both men would drink it simultaneously. When a guest trusted his host, he would then just touch or clink the host's glass with his own.
7. Q: Why are people in the public eye said to be 'in the limelight'?
A: Invented in 1825, limelight was used in lighthouses and stage lighting by burning a cylinder of lime which produced a brilliant light. In the theatre, performers on stage 'in the limelight' were seen by the audience to be the center of attention.
8. Q: Why do ships and aircraft in trouble use 'mayday' as their call for help?
A: This comes from the French word m'aidez - meaning 'help me' -- and is pronounced 'mayday.'
9. Q: Why is someone who is feeling great 'on cloud nine'?
A: Types of clouds are numbered according to the altitudes they attain, with nine being the highest cloud. If someone is said to be on cloud nine, that person is floating well above worldly cares.
10. Q: Why are zero scores in tennis called 'love'?
A: In France, where tennis first became popular, a big, round zero on the scoreboard looked like an egg and was called 'l'oeuf,' which is French for 'egg.' When tennis was introduced in the US, Americans pronounced it 'love.'
11. Q: In golf, where did the term 'Caddie' come from?
A. When Mary, later Queen of Scots, went to France as a young girl (for education & survival), Louis, King of France, learned that she loved the Scot game 'golf.' So he had the first golf course outside of Scotland built for her enjoyment. To make sure she was properly chaperoned (and guarded) while she played, Louis hired cadets from a military school to accompany her. Mary liked this a lot and when she returned to Scotland (not a very good idea in the long run), she took the practice with her. In French, the word cadet is pronounced 'ca-day' and the Scots changed it into 'caddie.'
Now YOU know just about everything !
These are some trivial things to know ...
1. Q: Why are many coin banks shaped like pigs?
A: Long ago, dishes and cookware in Europe were made of a dense orange clay called 'pygg'. When people saved coins in jars made of this clay, the jars became known as 'pygg banks.' When an English potter misunderstood the word, he made a bank that resembled a pig. And it caught on.
2. Q: Did you ever wonder why dimes, quarters and half dollars have notches, while pennies and nickels do not?
A: The US Mint began putting notches on the edges of coins containing gold and silver to discourage holders from shaving off small quantities of the precious metals. Dimes, quarters and half dollars are notched because they used to contain silver. Pennies and nickels aren't notched because the metals they contain are not valuable enough to shave..
3. Q: Why do men's clothes have buttons on the right while women's clothes have buttons on the left?
A: When buttons were invented, they were very expensive and worn primarily by the rich. Because wealthy women were dressed by maids, dressmakers put the buttons on the maid's right.! Since most people are right-handed, it is easier to push buttons on the right through holes on the left. And that's where women's buttons have remained since.
4. Q. Why do X's at the end of a letter signify kisses?
A: In the Middle Ages, when many people were unable to read or write, documents were often signed using an X. Kissing the X represented an oath to fulfill obligations specified in the document. The X and the kiss eventually became synonymous.
5. Q: Why is shifting responsibility to someone else called 'passing the buck'?
A: In card games, it was once customary to pass an item, called a buck, from player to player to indicate whose turn it was to deal. If a player did not wish to assume the responsibility, he would 'pass the buck' to the next player.
6. Q: Why do people clink their glasses before drinking a toast?
A: It used to be common for someone to try to kill an enemy by offering him a poisoned drink. To prove to a guest that a drink was safe, it became customary for a guest to pour a small amount of his drink into the glass of the host. Both men would drink it simultaneously. When a guest trusted his host, he would then just touch or clink the host's glass with his own.
7. Q: Why are people in the public eye said to be 'in the limelight'?
A: Invented in 1825, limelight was used in lighthouses and stage lighting by burning a cylinder of lime which produced a brilliant light. In the theatre, performers on stage 'in the limelight' were seen by the audience to be the center of attention.
8. Q: Why do ships and aircraft in trouble use 'mayday' as their call for help?
A: This comes from the French word m'aidez - meaning 'help me' -- and is pronounced 'mayday.'
9. Q: Why is someone who is feeling great 'on cloud nine'?
A: Types of clouds are numbered according to the altitudes they attain, with nine being the highest cloud. If someone is said to be on cloud nine, that person is floating well above worldly cares.
10. Q: Why are zero scores in tennis called 'love'?
A: In France, where tennis first became popular, a big, round zero on the scoreboard looked like an egg and was called 'l'oeuf,' which is French for 'egg.' When tennis was introduced in the US, Americans pronounced it 'love.'
11. Q: In golf, where did the term 'Caddie' come from?
A. When Mary, later Queen of Scots, went to France as a young girl (for education & survival), Louis, King of France, learned that she loved the Scot game 'golf.' So he had the first golf course outside of Scotland built for her enjoyment. To make sure she was properly chaperoned (and guarded) while she played, Louis hired cadets from a military school to accompany her. Mary liked this a lot and when she returned to Scotland (not a very good idea in the long run), she took the practice with her. In French, the word cadet is pronounced 'ca-day' and the Scots changed it into 'caddie.'
Now YOU know just about everything !
About BHO... Thanks Lou!
Must Read
'Just Call It Income Redistribution...
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department
of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied SDA loans
due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997."
The case was entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black
farmers won their case.
The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle
their claims.
But then on February 23, 2010, something shocking happened in relation
to that original judgment: In total silence, the USDA agreed to release
more funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering...... $1.25 billion.
This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers had now swollen in a class
action suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America .
There was only one problem: The United States of America doesn't have
86,000 black farmers!
According to accurate and totally verifiable Official USDA 2007 Census
census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is
only 39,697. By the Official USDA 1992 Census data the US had only
18,816 black farmers!
Well, how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent 86,000 claims ?
And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion ?
Well folks, you'll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded
this case because of her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network"
but whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13
million) from that action - Shirley Sherrod.
Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the
United States - - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at
the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more interesting.
Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in
this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford v. Glickman" in 1999
only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers. But.... in 2008,
a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more
black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of
a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.
But Secretary Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he
cleverly laid a trap which Sherrod - - and Obama + his cronies - -
stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted in the entire world
discovering the existence of this corrupt financial judgment.
As for Ms. Sherrod ?? Well, she's discovering too late that her cry of
'racism' to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on
Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and the huge
corruption.
Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it seems, have come
home to roost.
But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to
unlawful claims & corruption..... is still trying to fool all of US.
Google and read for yourself "Pigford vs. Glickman"
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a
fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their
"president."
Protect Yourself When Forwarding, Always Remove The Previous
E-Mail Address Trail, And Use "BCC".
'Just Call It Income Redistribution...
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department
of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied SDA loans
due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997."
The case was entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black
farmers won their case.
The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle
their claims.
But then on February 23, 2010, something shocking happened in relation
to that original judgment: In total silence, the USDA agreed to release
more funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering...... $1.25 billion.
This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers had now swollen in a class
action suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America .
There was only one problem: The United States of America doesn't have
86,000 black farmers!
According to accurate and totally verifiable Official USDA 2007 Census
census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is
only 39,697. By the Official USDA 1992 Census data the US had only
18,816 black farmers!
Well, how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent 86,000 claims ?
And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion ?
Well folks, you'll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded
this case because of her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network"
but whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13
million) from that action - Shirley Sherrod.
Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the
United States - - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at
the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more interesting.
Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in
this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford v. Glickman" in 1999
only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers. But.... in 2008,
a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more
black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of
a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.
But Secretary Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he
cleverly laid a trap which Sherrod - - and Obama + his cronies - -
stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted in the entire world
discovering the existence of this corrupt financial judgment.
As for Ms. Sherrod ?? Well, she's discovering too late that her cry of
'racism' to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on
Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and the huge
corruption.
Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it seems, have come
home to roost.
But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to
unlawful claims & corruption..... is still trying to fool all of US.
Google and read for yourself "Pigford vs. Glickman"
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a
fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their
"president."
Protect Yourself When Forwarding, Always Remove The Previous
E-Mail Address Trail, And Use "BCC".
FWD- Joe vs. Jose... Jack Plymale has many "in the know" friends
Wow, Jack and James!
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists) for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC! Free these slaves to be deported and free our future generations of Americans for this still great country!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack H Plymale
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Cook
This is the real issue with illegals!
Wow, Jack!
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists)for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message ----- From: Jack H Plymale Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00 Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Cook
This is the real issue with illegals!
You have two families: "Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .
Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Do you get it, now?
If you vote for or support ANY politician that supports illegal aliens...YOU are part of the problem!
It's way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans! VOTE 'EM ALL OUT IN 2010!!!!!
What are you waiting for?
Copy and Send this on!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Jack P.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Jack P.
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists) for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC! Free these slaves to be deported and free our future generations of Americans for this still great country!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack H Plymale
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Cook
This is the real issue with illegals!
Wow, Jack!
We are supporting the US Illegal slave trade (low cost slaves for those supporting the lobbyists)for the strong lobbyists and elitist Governmentos in DC!
Americans are a generous breed, thanks mainly to our Christian God, but must we remain so stupid and duped?
Sam
----- Original Message ----- From: Jack H Plymale Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 23:00 Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd Joe vs Jose
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Cook
This is the real issue with illegals!
You have two families: "Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .
Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Do you get it, now?
If you vote for or support ANY politician that supports illegal aliens...YOU are part of the problem!
It's way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans! VOTE 'EM ALL OUT IN 2010!!!!!
What are you waiting for?
Copy and Send this on!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Jack P.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Jack P.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)