Welcome

Welcome to my blog http://www.skegley.blogspot.com/ . CAVEAT LECTOR- Let the reader beware. This is a Christian Conservative blog. It is not meant to offend anyone. Please feel free to ignore this blog, but also feel free to browse and comment on my posts! You may also scroll down to respond to any post.

For Christian American readers of this blog:


I wish to incite all Christians to rise up and take back the United States of America with all of God's manifold blessings. We want the free allowance of the Bible and prayers allowed again in schools, halls of justice, and all governing bodies. We don't seek a theocracy until Jesus returns to earth because all men are weak and power corrupts the very best of them.
We want to be a kinder and gentler people without slavery or condescension to any.

The world seems to be in a time of discontent among the populace. Christians should not fear. God is Love, shown best through Jesus Christ. God is still in control. All Glory to our Creator and to our God!


A favorite quote from my good friend, Jack Plymale, which I appreciate:

"Wars are planned by old men,in council rooms apart. They plan for greater armament, they map the battle chart, but: where sightless eyes stare out, beyond life's vanished joys, I've noticed,somehow, all the dead and mamed are hardly more than boys(Grantland Rice per our mutual friend, Sarah Rapp)."

Thanks Jack!

I must admit that I do not check authenticity of my posts. If anyone can tell me of a non-biased arbitrator, I will attempt to do so more regularly. I know of no such arbitrator for the internet.











Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Bill O'Reilly: OK gor Cruz to pull GOP Further Right ... Thx Newsmax!



Bill O'Reilly: OK for Cruz to Pull GOP Further Right

Tuesday, 24 Sep 2013 07:25 AM
By Greg Richter
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Sen. Ted Cruz, under attack by members of his own party, has a right to try to move the GOP toward a more conservative position, Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly says.

Cruz wants to be the leader of the Republican Party, and he doesn't like the way it's being run, O'Reilly said Monday on "The O'Reilly Factor."

"He thinks it's far too liberal, and it's not in-your-face enough, not confrontational," O'Reilly said. "So he's breaking away from the consensus middle to stake out his own area that he's going to be the leader."

Editor's Note: Should ObamaCare Be Defunded? Vote in Urgent National Poll

Cruz wants to be president and re-energize the tea party movement, O'Reilly said. "He wants people to coalesce around his view of the country. There's nothing wrong with that."

O'Reilly asked guest Karl Rove why mainstream Republicans don't debate Cruz rather than attack him. "Win the debate, that's what it's all about."

The Republican strategist Rove, who is one of Cruz's critics,  said the problem is that Cruz doesn't debate. Cruz's fellow senators complain to Rove that they have no idea what his plans are until he makes public statements.

"His fellow senators don't know where he's coming from," Rove said.

O'Reilly continued with what he called his defense of Cruz. He said the tea party won big in 2010, but failed miserably in 2012.

"You gotta win if you want to dismantle Obamacare," O'Reilly said. "Cruz may be the guy to take the tea party up again."

"Well, we'll see," Rove answered.



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

SamKat- things I believe

Things I believe:

I will continue voting Republican although I am a Tea Party person and a conservative Christian.  Only votes from the two major parties matter in American elections every other year. I believe a solid majority of American citizens share my beliefs in the political arena, but all too few have been voting that way recently.

I believe most of the four hundred thirty-five Representatives, one hundred Senators and the Supreme Court and our supposed potus people who have acted in a non-representative way of the USA citizens,would be better out of their positions.  Ours is a representative government which has become out of control due to a lack of participation by the majority of our citizens. 

I love the idea of "kinder and gentler"; however the islamic terrorists have avowed their desires to kill all Americans and particularly Christians of all nations, and they aclaim the Kuran instructs them so. 

I am a sinner as Pope Francis also proclaims.  I love his humility, even in light of his exalted position with the Catholic Church.

I believe Republicans love to maintain their positions of power, but they are more reasonable than the secular progressive democrtats who walked out of Senator Isse's hearings when Benghazi family members of the four USA citizens killed in the senseless attacks 9/11/2012, were testifying.  Democrats, more than Republicans, put their party desires above our country and the expected Potus reactions.  obama acted cowardly then and does so repeatedlly.  He is not qualified to be our Commander in Chief, and he continues to go against the majority people's wishes.  Conservative Christians are the majjority, but are not voting with the correct frame of what is happening to our country and to our world.

My preference over Romney, who is a very good man, was Gingrich and I believe the best speaker for conservatives is Sarah Palin.  The Republicans did nothing to protect these stronger candidates and they are again putting down Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.   That is why I am Tea Party mamber above being a Republican.  I do not want to lose to another secular progressive in the upcoming 2014 and 2016 elections.  Nevertheless, I still know that our God, Christ's Father is in control of this world.

SamKat


Frank Bruni- NYT ColumnistThe pope's radical whisper ... Col's Dispatch 9/24/2013 pA16


 

The pope's radical whisper

Pope Francis talks during his general audience in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican earlier this year.

Reuters

Pope Francis talks during his general audience in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican earlier this year.

It's about time. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church has surveyed the haughty scolds in its ranks, noted their fixation on matters of sexual morality above all others and said enough is enough. I'm not being cheeky with this one-word response. Hallelujah.
But it wasn't the particulars of Pope Francis' groundbreaking message in an interview published last week that stopped me in my tracks, gave fresh hope to many embittered Catholics and caused hardened commentators to perk up.
It was the sweetness in his timbre, the meekness of his posture. It was the revelation that a man can wear the loftiest of miters without having his head swell to fit it and can hold an office to which the term "infallible" is often attached without forgetting his failings. In the interview, Francis called himself naive, worried that he'd been rash in the past and made clear that the flock harbored as much wisdom as the shepherds.
Instead of commanding people to follow him, he invited them to join him. And did so gently, in what felt like a whisper.
What a surprising portrait of modesty in a church that had lost touch with it. And what a refreshing example of humility in a world with too little of it.
That's what stayed with me, not the olive branch he extended to gay people or the way he brushed aside the contraception wars but his personification of a virtue whose deficit in American life hit me full force when I spotted it here, in his disarming words. Reading and then rereading the interview, I felt like a bird-watcher who had just stumbled upon a dodo.
I'm hardly the first to flag this pope's apparent humility or the fact that it extends beyond his preference for simple dress over regal costumes, for a Ford Focus over a papal chariot, for modest quarters over a monarch's suite. Less than two months ago, when he answered a question about gay priests with a question of his own — "Who am I to judge?" — the self-effacement in that phrase was widely and rightly celebrated. Was a pope really acting and talking like this?
But Francis' tone so far is interesting not just as a departure for the church but as a counterpoint to the prevailing sensibility in our country, where humility is endangered if not quite extinct. It's out of sync with all the relentless self-promotion, which has been deemed the very oxygen of success. It sits oddly with the cult of self-esteem.
Humility has little place in the realm of social media, which is governed by a look-at-me ethos, by listen-to-me come-ons, by me, me, me. And humility is quaintly irrelevant to the defining entertainment genre of our time, reality television, which insists that every life is mesmerizing, if only in the manner of a train wreck, and that anyone is a latent star: the housewife, the hoarder, the teen mom, the tuna fisher. Just preen enough to catch an audience's eye. Just beckon the cameras close.
Politics is most depressing of all. It rewards braggarts and bullies, who muscle their way onto center stage with the crazy certainty that they and only they are right, while we in the electorate and the news media lack the fortitude to shut them up or shoo them away. They disgust but divert us, or at a minimum wear us down. Maybe we get the showboats we deserve.
For a textbook case of humility gone missing, consider right-wing Republicans' efforts to derail Obamacare by whatever crude and disruptive means necessary. The health care law has its flaws, some of them profound, but it was legitimately passed, in accordance with the rules, and to stray outside them in order to make it go away is to believe that they don't apply to you, that your viewpoint trumps the process itself. It's the summit of arrogance.
Humility doesn't work in the cross-fire of our political combat. Certainty and single-mindedness are better fuels.
How exactly does President Barack Obama fit in? While his Syria reversals may well have diminished him, they had a sort of humility to them, reflected a willingness to yield to the strong feelings of others and deserve some acknowledgment along those lines. Leadership, more art than science, should be a mix of rallying people to your cause and recognizing when you stand too far away from them.
But in Obama there's a recurrent deflection of criticism and a refusal to abide certain political customs and efficiencies — the stroking, the rewarding, the mantra-style repetition of a simplified argument for a distracted populace — that work against his success and smack of excessive pride. He could take a page from this pope.
I never expected to write that. For too many years, I watched the chieftains of the church wrap themselves in lavish pageantry and prioritize the protection of fellow clergy members over the welfare of parishioners. They allowed priests who sexually abused children to evade accountability and, in many cases, to abuse again. That cover-up was the very antithesis of humility, driven by the belief that shielding the church from public scandal mattered more than anything else.
For too many years, I also watched and listened to imperious men around the pope hurl thunderbolts of judgment from the Olympus of Vatican City. But in his recent interview, Francis made a plea for quieter, calmer weather, suggesting that church leaders in Rome spend less energy on denunciations and censorship.
He cast himself as a struggling pastor determined to work in a collaborative fashion. He characterized himself as a sinner. "It is not a figure of speech, a literary genre," he clarified. "I am a sinner."
He didn't right past wrongs. Let's be clear about that. Didn't call for substantive change to church teachings and traditions that indeed demand re-examination, including the belief that homosexual acts themselves are sinful. Didn't challenge the all-male, celibate priesthood. Didn't speak as progressively — and fairly — about women's roles in the church as he should.
But he also didn't present himself as someone with all the answers. No, he stepped forward — shuffled forward, really — as someone willing to guide fellow questioners. In doing so, he recognized that authority can come from a mix of sincerity and humility as much as from any blazing, blinding conviction and that stature is a respect you earn, not a pedestal you grab. That's a useful lesson in this grabby age of ours.
Frank Bruni is a columnist for The New York Times.

Lerner, (Tea Party Hater) rertires from IRS

Lerner, (Tea Party Hater), retires- Newsmax 9/24/2013


Kramer's speech- Why are whites the only racists? ... thx clay V!

Kramer's speech-  Why are whites the only racists?



Thought you might think this was an interesting talk! I liked it. 


I have been wondering about why Whites are racists,
and no other race is...
Proud to be White
Michael Richards makes his point...

Michael Richards better known as Kramer
from TVs' Seinfeld does make a good point.
This was his defense speech in court
after making racial comments in his comedy act.
In it he raised a few interesting points...

Someone finally said it.
But how many are actually paying attention to this?

There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans,
Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans...
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.

You call me 'White boy', 'Cracker', 'Honkey', 'Whitey', 'Caveman'...
And that's OK...
But when I call you Nigger, Kike,
Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink...
You call me a racist.

You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you...
So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live in?

You have the United Negro College Fund.
You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Yom Hashoah.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP.
You have BET...

Imagine if we had WET
(White Entertainment Television)...
we'd be racists.

If we had a White Pride Day,
you would call us racists.

If we had White History Month,
we'd be racists.

If we had any organization for whites only to 'advance' OUR lives,
we'd be racists.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce,
and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that???

A white woman could not be in the
Miss Black American pageant,
but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships...
You know we'd be racists.

There are over 60 openly proclaimed
Black Colleges in the US ...
Yet if there were 'White colleges',
that would be a racist college.

In the Million Men March,
you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.
If we marched for our race and rights,
you would call us racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange,
and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our white pride,
you call us racists.

You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.
But,
when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

I am proud...
But you call me a racist.

Why is it that only whites can be racists???

There is nothing improper
about this e-mail...
But let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on.
I sadly don't think many will.

That's why
we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS
in this country.
We won't stand up for ourselves!

BE PROUD
TO BE WHITE!

It's not a crime YET...
But getting very close!

It is estimated that ONLY 5%
of those reaching this point in this
e-mail, will pass it on.
BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

Blog Definition

On Line Blog Definition
Google-Blog Definitionblog, short for web log, an online, regularly updated journal or newsletter that is readily accessible to the general public by virtue of being posted on a website.