Social Security history ... Thanks Judi C.!

This should get everyone riled up - please forward to your Dem friends.

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card     Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this. It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it.  Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts. Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed. An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message. Our Social SecurityFranklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised: 1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, No longer Voluntary 2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program, Now 7.65% on the first $90,000 3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year, No longer tax deductible 4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent 5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away' -- you may be interested in the following: ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---- Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it? A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate. ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -- Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding? A: The Democratic Party. ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----- Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities? A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the  US ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants? AND MY FAVORITE: A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it! ------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- --------- Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to ?   -----------------   Dick Kantenberger Gifted Education Writer Examiner.com

Being passed on as received ... obama

Subject: Being passed on as received

 

I cannot confirm or deny any of the following.  I can tell you I have already read on the Internet or have heard on the TV news channels much of what is in the article below.  My guess is you have also.  Plus, this writer comes right out and lists her sources at the end, all of which can be accessed by all of us if we have any doubts and care to check them out.

What scares me more than anything is I know or have met far too many voters who are pathetically ignorant of Obama and know only what the “elite left wing” media, which is in the tank for Obama, has told them.  When you add to that that Obama is an attractive, personable person, father and husband, those who are either too lazy or don’t care enough to do any research to educate and inform themselves will vote for him again.  You can rest assured I hope I’m wrong.  RB

****************************************************************

 This came from a Facebook page. Check the link below.

http://www.facebook.com/JewishTeaPartyUSA/posts/387607397941101

This is about Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.

I believe this is worth passing along to as many voters as possible.....

I am merely passing this on as received.

Written by a female Obama supporter who voted for him for president.

Legitimate Question

This election has me very worried. So many things to consider. I voted for Obama. McCain was a Washington insider and we don't need any more of them. I have changed my mind three times, since then.  I watch all the news channels, jumping from one to another.  I must say this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view CNN and Fox News, you might get some middle ground to work with. I started thinking, "where does all the money come from for President Obama?”  I have four daughters who went to College, and we were middle class, and money was tight. We (including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans.  I started looking into Obama's history for my own peace of mind.

Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental. He tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.  "Barry" (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan.  During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a "round the world" trip. Stopping to see his mother in  Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family.

My question - Where did he get the money for this trip? Neither I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they were in college.  When he came back, he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry.   Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia?  It's not cheap to say the least.

My girls asked me; where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe it's none of my business?

After Columbia , he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000 a year.  Why Chicago?  Why not New York? He was already living in New York. By "chance,” he met Antoin "Tony" Rezko, who was born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago.  Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery several times in the past and again in 2011.  Rezko, was named "Entrepreneur of the Decade" by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association." About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School?  Where did he get the money for Law School?  More student loans?  His family had no money that's for sure.

After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what I discovered?  They represented "Rezar" which is Rezko's firm.  Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago.  In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with "seed money" for his U.S. Senate race.

In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in the Kenwood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for this property?  On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price.  The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.

Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this?  Shiraz, Iran. Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?

On May 10, 2008, the Times reported, Robert Malley, advisor to Obama was "sacked" after the press found out he was having regular contacts with "Hamas," which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran.  This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will "Take care of things."  What does that mean?

Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that were born in Pakistan?  They are in charge of all those "small" Internet campaign contributions for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East?

And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2009, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos.  Obama on talking about his religion said, "My Muslim faith."  When questioned, "he made a mistake." Some mistake, huh?

All of the above information I got on line. If you would like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times - Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.

Now the BIG question - If I found out all this information on my own, why have not all of our "intelligent" members of the press been reporting this?  Is this a Kettle of Fish?

As Arsenio Hall would say.----"HUMMMMMMM! Does something stink or is it my imagination?"  Are not these are legitimate questions for our president? 

Rachelle Derrough

Provider - M.D., RS - PHYSICIANS FOR WOMEN

CoxHealth

Mike Reagan: obama is no Jimmy Carter

Mike Reagan: Obama Is No Jimmy Carter

Inbox

x

Newsmax.com	4:48 PM (1 hour ago)
to me

Images are not displayed. Display images below - Always display images from newsmax@reply.newsmax.com

Urgent Message from Michael Reagan Dear Newsmax Reader: I keep hearing that this election is going to be just like my Dad's landslide win against Jimmy Carter. I hope they are right! But they are wrong in thinking Barack Obama is Jimmy Carter. He isn't. He is much more dangerous. And it's critically important to understand the difference between the two if we are going to defeat him. First, let's start with how they are same. Both Carter and Obama presided over a major economic recession. Both had a "blame America first policy" in foreign affairs. Barack Obama's foreign policy is a mess, but we won't see the results of it until a second term, God forbid. With Carter we had the Iran hostage crisis and Soviet adventurism in Afghanistan and Latin America. Both simply hated conservatives. Both were egomaniacs and control freaks. Now for the real differences. Barack Obama is eminently more "likable" than Jimmy Carter. Polls suggest he's even more likable than Mitt Romney. And that's the danger. That the American people fall into the "likability" trap. If you noticed, Barack Obama and his wife have been hitting all the late night chat shows, — Leno, Letterman, Kimmel. Obama even dissed Prime Minister Netanyahu to have a love fest chat on "The View." The Obamas want to talk about everything except their record. They want to be liked! So far, their strategy has worked. But we have another strategy: getting Americans to focus on Obama's performance as president. I believe it is even worse than Jimmy Carter's! And yet Obama is ahead in many polls and even leads in several swing states. Clearly, the liberal media are pulling out the stops to get him re-elected. They fear Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. As you may know, I am National Chairman of Super PAC for America. This is a remarkable organization that played a key role in the GOP winning Congress in 2010. Its chief strategist is Dick Morris, the former presidential political adviser who has a history of winning big political races, often when his candidate was declared the "loser" by the big media. Dick and I share the same philosophy. This election is about one thing: Barack Obama's job performance. The more we focus voters — especially swing voters — on Obama's record — he loses! Frankly, the Romney campaign has not run ads as effectively as they could have. This may be a reason he lags in key states. Right now we are airing ads in 5 critical swing states. In two of them, Florida and Virginia, it looks like we have had a major effect and Obama is now well behind. Super PAC for America needs to expand to 3 more additional swing states by early next week. We urgently need your help to do so — Please Donate Here Now Dick Morris and I have produced a powerful new ad that is taken from the second presidential debate. During the debate, Gov. Romney smashed Obama on his job performance, detailing all of his failings. It's a powerful statement of what's at stake. Super PAC for America has used Mitt's remarks and put them into a 60-second ad. It works really well. If you haven't seen it — Go Here Now. Not only does it present the simple and honest "facts" about Obama, but it's done in a way that shows Mitt Romney as "likable" — he is a patriotic American like you and me, a family man who cares about this country. He has no personal gripe against Barack Obama. I think you will agree that the future of our country is at stake. Four more years of Obama and we may not recognize our great country! With days to go before Election Day, I am asking you to take a stand with me. I am asking you to take a personal stand. To support us financially in this endeavor to stop and roll back Obama's radical agenda. If you will stand with me and for America — Donate Here Now I can't thank you enough for helping us so far. Back two months ago, Mitt Romney was already declared the loser. We have fought the good fight. Mitt can win this. He will win this. With your help and God's favor, nothing can stop him. Please help him today — Go Here Now Yours for America, Mike Reagan P.S. I am appending Dick Morris' recent letter about our new ad and Super PAC. In case you missed it, please read it below. And one more thing, after donating, please forward this email to friends and family. Let's go viral! We can take back America! Donate Here Now! Urgent Message from Dick Morris Re: Mitt Romney's Indictment of Obama Record Dear Newsmax Reader: Now with just over a week before D-Day -- our national election -- the key swing states are showing Obama is in deep trouble. There are real indications that Obama's camp is simply abandoning significant ad buys in Florida, Virginia and N. Carolina. Remember those states they said were "in the bag" for Obama? Now, they are pulling up their stakes and moving dwindling campaign funds into a handful of swing states -- states Romney is gaining in. I predicted weeks ago that this would happen. Obama simply can't win a national election and he can't win all the key "swing" states his campaign targeted. Frankly, we have Barack Obama on the run. Typically, Democrats hold a big advantage over the Republicans among women voters. The pundits calls this the "gender gap." But the AP poll released Thursday had a political shocker: Mitt Romney is tied with Obama among women voters at 47 percent! This is stunning news. Obama can't win re-election without holding a majority of women! He is in deep trouble and the Obama camp knows it. And one reason why are turning the corner is that Super PAC for America is holding Obama's feet to the fire. This is the Super PAC headed by its national chair Mike Reagan. Mike has brought together some of the great minds of the GOP, including people who helped his Dad win two landslide elections, to make sure that Mitt Romney wins on Election Day and that Barack Obama is put into early retirement. Mike asked me to serve as chief strategist for Super PAC for America and to create the TV ads that can turn the tide for Mitt. We are doing just that -- thanks to the tens of thousands of donors who are supporting Super PAC. Our first Super PAC ad is a powerful expose of Obama's dismal job record. It is powerful in its simplicity: a black screen that lists Obama's dismal economic numbers -- followed by chants of "Four more years!" A voice comes on at the end of the screen and says: "You've got to be kidding!" When I watched Mitt Romney at the second debate, I saw him use the same focus. I was so impressed with Mitt's comments about Obama I created a powerful new ad for Super PAC -- using Mitt's very own words. In fact, Mitt's remarks may prove to be the turning point of the campaign. They are the equivalent of Ronald Reagan's 1980 debate line that crushed Jimmy Carter: "Are you better off than you were four years ago." You can see the new Super PAC ad by Going Here Now. Right now, we have our first Super PAC ad in 5 key swing states -- Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, Florida, and Iowa. We'd like to continue this effort and grow the campaign into other potential swing states, such as Nevada and New Hampshire. But we urgently need funds to do so -- if you can help please Donate Here Now I believe that the final holdouts -- the swing voters who have yet to decide -- will fall overwhelmingly into Mitt's column. But we need to keep the focus on Obama and his failure to lead, his failure to perform, his failure to make America's economy grow. You probably heard Mitt's eloquent and persuasive case made during the second debate. Here's what Mitt Romney said: "I can tell you that if you were to elect President Obama, you know what you’re going to get. You’re going to get a repeat of the last four years. . . "He said that by now we’d have unemployment at 5.4 percent. The difference between where it is and 5.4 percent is 9 million Americans without work. "I wasn’t the one that said 5.4 percent. This was the president’s plan — didn’t get there. "He said he would have by now put forward a plan to reform Medicare and Social Security because he pointed out they’re on the road to bankruptcy. He would reform them. He’d get that done. "He hasn’t even made a proposal on either one. "He said in his first year he’d put out an immigration plan that would deal with our immigration challenges — didn’t even file it. "This is a president who has not been able to do what he said he’d do. He said that he’d cut in half the deficit. He hasn’t done that either. In fact, he doubled it. "He said that by now middle-income families would have a reduction in their health insurance premiums by $2,500 a year. It’s gone up by $2,500 a year. And if 'Obamacare' is passed — or implemented, it’s already been passed — if it’s implemented fully, it’ll be another $2,500 on top. "The middle class is getting crushed under the policies of a president who has not understood what it takes to get the economy working again. He keeps saying, look, I’ve created 5 million jobs. "That’s after losing 5 million jobs. The entire record is such that the unemployment has not been reduced in this country. "The unemployment, the number of people who are still looking for work, is still 23 million Americans. "There are more people in poverty — one out of six people in poverty. "How about food stamps? When he took office, 32 million people were on food stamps; today 47 million people are on food stamps. "How about the growth of the economy? It’s growing more slowly this year than last year and more slowly last year than the year before. "The president wants to do well; I understand. But the policies he’s put in place, from 'Obamacare' to Dodd-Frank to his tax policies to his regulatory policies — these policies combined have not let this economy take off and grow like it could have." Wow! What a powerful indictment of Obama's record -- and spoken in a nonjudgmental way! I believe if Americans hear this, and think about it, they will vote with us and Mitt Romney will become our next president. But I need your help to make sure this happens. Right now, Mike Reagan and Super PAC for America are making last-minute decisions to grow our major media offensive against Obama. Any help you can give will make a big difference -- please Donate Here Now. Super PAC wants to continue in the key swing states and put more ads on the air. We also want to share these ads across the Internet to millions of Internet users who will be using the Web to help them make up their minds. If you have already donated, please donate again by Going Here Now And remember, the Super PAC for America can accept corporate and personal donations of unlimited amount. Frankly, if you sent $100,000 it could be decisive in some of these key swing states, especially where polls show the race will be close. But even donations of $1000, $500, $250 or $100 can make a huge difference. And thousands of people even making $25 or $50 donations can help us win medium-sized markets in key swing states. Paul Ryan said today "this is the most important election of our lifetime." He added we are deciding the "destiny of our country." I couldn't agree more. I know you do too. So please act today -- Donate Here Now. Thank you. Yours for America, Dick Morris P.S. If you donate today and I receive your financial commitment by Monday, I can push this new powerful ad featuring Mitt into key swing states by Wednesday. Millions can be affected. But Super PAC needs your help today. Please Donate Here Now Paid for by Super PAC for America. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. www.superPACforAmerica.com. Super PAC for America does not make contributions to candidates. Funds raised by Super PAC for America will only be used for independent expenditures in support of or opposition to candidates. Super PAC for America is permitted to accept contributions from individuals and corporations in any amount, provided that contributions from foreign nationals lacking permanent resident status and contributions from federal contractors may not be accepted. Contributions to Super PAC for America are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

Paul Ryan's Proposed Budget cuts

> PAUL RYAN'S PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS
>
> A List of Republican Budget Cuts
>
> Notice S.S. and the military are NOT on this list .
>
>
>
>
>
> These are all the programs that the new Republican House has proposed cutting.   Read to the end.
>
> * Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy -- $445 million annual savings.
> * Save   America   's Treasures Program -- $25 million annual savings.
> * International Fund for   Ireland   -- $17 million annual savings.
> * Legal Services Corporation -- $420 million annual savings.
> * National Endowment for the Arts -- $167.5 million annual savings.
> * National Endowment for the Humanities -- $167.5 million annual savings.
> * Hope VI Program -- $250 million annual savings.
> * Amtrak Subsidies -- $1.565 billion annual savings.
> * Eliminate duplicating education programs -- H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon, eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually.
> *   U.S.   Trade Development Agency -- $55 million annual savings.
> *   Woodrow Wilson Center   Subsidy -- $20 million annual savings.
> * Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding -- $47 million annual savings.
> *   John C. Stennis Center   Subsidy -- $430,000 annual savings.
> * Community Development Fund -- $4.5 billion annual savings.
> * Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid -- $24 million annual savings.
> * Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half -- $7.5 billion annual savings
> * Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20% -- $600 million annual savings.
> * Essential Air Service -- $150 million annual savings.
> * Technology Innovation Program -- $70 million annual savings.
> * Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program -- $125 million annual savings..
> * Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization -- $530 million annual savings.
> * Beach Replenishment -- $95 million annual savings.
> * New Starts Transit -- $2 billion annual savings.
> ·         Exchange Programs for Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Their Historical Trading Partners in   Massachusetts   -- $9 million annual savings
> * Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants -- $2.5 billion annual savings.
> * Title X Family Planning -- $318 million annual savings.
> * Appalachian Regional Commission -- $76 million annual savings.
> * Economic Development Administration -- $293 million annual savings.
> * Programs under the National and Community Services Act -- $1.15 billion annual savings.
> * Applied Research at Department of Energy -- $1.27 billion annual savings.
> * Freedom CAR and Fuel Partnership -- $200 million annual savings..
> * Energy Star Program -- $52 million annual savings.
> * Economic Assistance to   Egypt   -- $250 million annually .
> * U.S. Agency for International Development -- $1.39 billion annual savings.
> * General Assistance to   District of Columbia   -- $210 million annual savings.
> * Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority -- $150 million annual savings.
> * Presidential Campaign Fund -- $775 million savings over ten years .
> * No funding for federal office space acquisition -- $864 million annual savings.
> * E nd prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.
> * Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act -- More than $1 billion annually.
> * IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget -- $1.8 billion savings over ten years.
> * Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees -- $1 billion total savings. WHAT THE HELL IS THISABOUT?
> * Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees -- $1.2 billion savings over ten years.
> * Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of -- $15 billion total savings.
> * Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress. WHAT???
> * Eliminate Mohair Subsidies -- $1 million annual savings.
> * Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- $12.5 million annual savings   WELL ISN'T THAT SPECIAL
> * Eliminate Market Access Program -- $200 million annual savings.
> * USDA Sugar Program -- $14 million annual savings.
> * Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) -- $93 million annual savings.
> * Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program -- $56.2 million annual savings.
> * Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs -- $ 900 million savings.
> * Ready to Learn TV Program -- $27 million savings..
> * HUD Ph.D. Program.
> * Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.
> * TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years
>
> My question is, what is all this doing in the budget in the first place ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe this is why the Democrats are attacking Paul Ryan.   .
>
>
>
> Please Send to everyone you know..

Watch for this on the ballot this year ...

*Subject:* Fwd: Watch for this on the ballot this year . . . . . . . . .
>   *Subject: *Fwd: Watch for this on the ballot this year . . . . . . . . .
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Watch for this on the ballot this year . . . . . . . . .
> Winds of Change....
> **Congressional Reform Act of 2012*  *
>
>
> Warren Buffet is  asking
>     each addressee to forward
> this email to a minimum of
> twenty people on their
> address list; in turn ask
> each of those to do likewise.
>
>
>
> In three days, most people
> in The United
> States of America will
> have the message.
> This is one idea that
> really should be
> passed around.
>
>
>
> **Congressional Reform Act of 2012* *
>
>
> 1. No Tenure / No Pension.
> A Congressman/woman
>     collects a salary while in office
> and receives no pay when
> they're out of office.
>
>
> 2. Congress (past, present & future)
> participates in Social Security.  All funds in the
> Congressional retirement fund move to the
> Social Security system immediately.
> All future funds flow into the
> Social Security system, and  Congress
> participates with the American people. It
> may not be used for any other purpose.
>
>
> 3. Congress can purchase
> their own retirement plan,
> just as all Americans do.
>
>     4. Congress will no longer
> vote themselves a pay raise.
> Congressional pay will
> rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
>
>
> 5. Congress loses their
> current health care system and
> participates in the same health
> care system as the American people.
>
>
> 6. Congress must equally abide by all laws
> they impose on the American people.
>
>
>
> 7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void
> effective 12/31/12.  The American
> people did not make this contract with
> Congressmen/women.
> Congressmen/women made all
> these contracts for themselves. Serving in
> Congress is an honor, not a career.
> The Founding Fathers envisioned
> citizen legislators, so ours should
> serve their term(s), then go home and
> back to work.
>
> If each person contacts a minimum
> of twenty people then it  will
> only take three days for
> most people (in the U.S. )
> to receive the message.
>
>
> Don't you think it's  time?
>
>
> THIS IS HOW YOU FIX CONGRESS!
>
>
> If you agree with the
> above, pass it on. If not, just delete.
>
>     You are one of my 20+ -
>
>     Please keep it going, and thanks