Labiodental fricative Images and meaning - SamKat

T. J. D. passed me by with the labiodental fricative recently causing me to refresh the meaning:

Images of labiodental fricative

bing.com/images

See more images of labiodental fricative

Labiodental | Define Labiodental at Dictionary.com

www.dictionary.com/browse/labiodental

Labiodental definition, articulated with the lower lip touching the upper front teeth, as f or v, or, rarely, with the upper lip touching the lower front teeth. See more.

Faux Two Party System by Bob Livingston 0f "The Bob Livingston Letter" ... Thx Paul C! Add'l comments by Sam K

June 18, 2016

Paul,

This is a little much, even for me.  I want to believe so much of it,  but our college institutions all over are guilty if what Mr. Livingston says is so. They have so many good minds.  Are we all sheep?  I believe there are many intelligent and conservative Americans and I see such contrast between the leftist liberals and the rightist conservatives, I don't buy all of Livingston's conclusions.  Thx, and I am using it in my blog, even though it is too defeatist for Americans who hold tight to conservative ideals and Christianity.

He is far more in the know than I am but should I enjoy my being so naive.

Sam Kegley





Who am I voting for?
To: 

This is short and well worth the read! 

---

Carl, thanks for subscribing since 02/03/2014.
In my writing I have often demonstrated how the faux two-party system in America is a fraud designed to keep Americans distracted and divided, yet for some reason few others ever catch on. The brainwash is so complete that only someone like you, a reader of these alerts, ever gets through the net. I mean this sincerely! For example, there are still Republican voters who remain trapped in the false paradigm believing that the country will be made right again by simply electing a Republican president. The people are fooled by heated rhetoric because there is no difference in the parties or the candidates. The current "election process" is devious political demagoguery. The whole purpose of the political charade is the further advance of altruism. What a scam and what deception. Politicians do not act for the benefit of the country or the American people. But you know, very few people are aware of this. Somehow election after election we hear the same thing and get the same thing from whoever is in power. Anyway, it's not the politicians in power, but it's the powerful faceless people behind the scenes who pull the strings, although the elites in the Republican party hate people like me, and Ron Paul, and our readers and followers for pointing out their deception. The elites don't want you to know that a realistic understanding of the current "election" is a race to the bottom. They don't want you to think about how both parties are destroying what's left in attempting to gain political power. They don't want you to see that the two parties are not Democrat and Republican. They are government and the people. The U.S. government is an enemy of the people. The backdrop of current events invisible to all is a massive psychological warfare against the American people by the elite in power for 200 years. The American people are fast asleep. We are currently being ruled by a lawless oligarchy of nine Ivy league-educated satanists. The propaganda media endorse what they are told to endorse, and many of the sheeple, dumbed down by the public (non)education system and mainstream propaganda media, endorse this. How else would you account for the "random" attack in Orlando this past weekend? Guns, gays and Islamic "terror" all in the same incident. This could not have been a random act. This is not the country of our Founders. It's high time we returned to the founding document and employed a remedy advocated by the Founders. To do that, we must elect leaders at the state level willing to nullify federal usurpations and secede if necessary. I want to be perfectly honest with you. I wish I could tell you that events and history are random and political chance. I wish I could tell you that you should vote for political candidates and that you should believe in "democracy." History is not chance or accident. It is organized crime parasiting on millions of human pawns who live in fiction. Yet, I still believe in human freedom and I still believe that all of you can experience it to the extent that you expand your mind with permanent values and reading knowledge that makes each of you superior to the system that rules over us. I think it is imperative that we are practical enough and fine-tuned to the philosophy of this government to the point that we can match wits with the system. Otherwise we don't have a dog's chance to survive let alone prosper. We have a great country but an illegal government which does not abide by the Constitution and the laws of the land. "American Democracy" implies individual and personal freedom. They didn't change our name from America to Gulag nor arrest us in the middle of the night. Instead the Congress and the unelected rulers passed laws and regulations that put the American people directly and absolutely under the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto. And you know what? These laws were passed legally and sanctimoniously under the color of law right under our noses. Because when we vote "Republicrat," we are not voting in a free election. We are merely rubber stamping an entrenched bureaucratic system under the pretense of American Democracy. I love America but not the people who control America. The federal system is broken and cannot be repaired or restored, so it must be reset.  Yours for the truth, Bob Livingston Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

Justice for Hillary ... Laura Ingraham looking into ... Thx Paul C!

Joseph E. diGenova was United States Attorney, District of Columbia, the largest such office having more than 400 attorneys.  He supervised complex Federal criminal and civil matters including international drug smuggling, public corruption, espionage, insider trading, tax fraud, extradition, fraud, RICO, export control and international terrorism.  Many of these prosecutions involved negotiations with foreign governments.  He conducted a wide-ranging probe of corruption in the D.C. government, which led to the conviction of two deputy mayors.  He led the prosecution of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.  He was the Principal Assistant U.S. Attorney during the prosecution of attempted Presidential assassin, John W. Hinckley.

He gave this interview to Laura Ingraham.

DiGenova:

Her biggest problem right now is the FBI. They're not going away. They have reached a critical mass in their investigation of the Secretary and all of her senior staff.

And, it's going to come to a head, I would suggest, in the next sixty days. And, I predict that Hillary will not make it to the finish line.   She's not going to be able to complete her campaign. This criminal investigation must, of necessity, focus on her and all the people around her.  And, if Jim Comey, the FBI director, is doing his job, which I expect him to do as an honorable man, she cannot be the nominee of the Democratic Party.

She's going to have to be charged with a crime. It's going to be a very complex matter for the Department of Justice, but they're not going to be able to walk away from it.

She and her staff  have committed numerous federal crimes involving negligent and improper handling of classified information. They are now at over 1,200 classified emails, and those are just for the ones we know about from the State Department. That doesn't include the ones that the FBI is, in fact, recovering from her hard drives.

She has definitely made false statements, under oath, both in interviews and on Capitol Hill. She has not yet been interviewed by the FBI in their investigation. That will be the final step in their investigation.  The Bureau has so much information about criminal conduct by her and her staff that there is no way that they walk away from this. They're going to make a recommendation that people be charged, and then Loretta Lynch is going to have the decision of a lifetime.


Ingraham:

Do you have confidence  that Loretta Lynch, from what we saw with her handling of the Baltimore riots and all that, is going to okay to green light an indictment of Hillary Clinton in an election year?


DiGenova:

I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that unless she agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an Attorney General.  It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable. The evidence against the Clinton staff and the Secretary is so overwhelming at this point that if, in fact, she chooses not to charge Hillary, they will never be able to charge another federal employee with the negligent handling of classified information.

The intelligence community will not stand for that, they will fight for an indictment, and they are already in the process of girding themselves to, basically, revolt against the Attorney General if she refuses to bring charges.  There is a massive breach between the intelligence community, the military community, at the Department of State, and the national security superstructure inside the intelligence community. There is vitriol of an intense amount developing , you can hear it in your conversations with people in the intelligence community. They will fight to the death if the Attorney General attempts to bury this case.

It's going to be very, very ugly for her. And it's going to be an awful ending to the Obama Administration, but one which they richly deserve.