Welcome

Welcome to my blog http://www.skegley.blogspot.com/ . CAVEAT LECTOR- Let the reader beware. This is a Christian Conservative blog. It is not meant to offend anyone. Please feel free to ignore this blog, but also feel free to browse and comment on my posts! You may also scroll down to respond to any post.

For Christian American readers of this blog:


I wish to incite all Christians to rise up and take back the United States of America with all of God's manifold blessings. We want the free allowance of the Bible and prayers allowed again in schools, halls of justice, and all governing bodies. We don't seek a theocracy until Jesus returns to earth because all men are weak and power corrupts the very best of them.
We want to be a kinder and gentler people without slavery or condescension to any.

The world seems to be in a time of discontent among the populace. Christians should not fear. God is Love, shown best through Jesus Christ. God is still in control. All Glory to our Creator and to our God!


A favorite quote from my good friend, Jack Plymale, which I appreciate:

"Wars are planned by old men,in council rooms apart. They plan for greater armament, they map the battle chart, but: where sightless eyes stare out, beyond life's vanished joys, I've noticed,somehow, all the dead and mamed are hardly more than boys(Grantland Rice per our mutual friend, Sarah Rapp)."

Thanks Jack!

I must admit that I do not check authenticity of my posts. If anyone can tell me of a non-biased arbitrator, I will attempt to do so more regularly. I know of no such arbitrator for the internet.











Showing posts with label Vote-em out 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vote-em out 2012. Show all posts

Sunday, November 4, 2012

My first Christmas card of the year .. Thanks LindaO. amd George K.!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Fwd: MERRY CHRISTMAS...MY FIRST CARD OF THE YEAR!!!
Inbox
x

speck6085@aol.com
6:48 AM (9 hours ago)

to bessiemaymucho, davem2442, FRAMSEY, kaileria, kglykg, leegraham, lisa420lisa2010, piercejames33, me, skegley1



-----Original Message-----
From: leegraham <leegraham@aol.com>

 
 
Roy
Subj: Fwd: MERRY CHRISTMAS...MY FIRST CARD OF THE YEAR!!!
 



 
 
 
 
Subject: MERRY CHRISTMAS...MY FIRST CARD OF THE YEAR!!!
 
MERRY CHRISTMAS...MY FIRST CARD OF THE YEAR!!!
I love Christmas lights. They remind me of the people who voted for Obama.
They all hang together; half of them don't work, and the ones that do, aren't all that bright.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

NAACP takes over voting station inb Houston


Tip Sheet

BREAKING: NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama

Click if you like this post!

HOUSTON, TX - Friday afternoon at an early polling place located at 6719 W. Montgomery Road in Houston, NAACP members were seen advocating for President Barack Obama according to volunteer poll watchers on location at the time.
According to Eve Rockford, a poll watcher trained by voter integrity group True the Vote, three NAACP members showed up to the 139 precinct location with 50 cases of bottled water and began handing bottles out to people standing in line. While wearing NAACP labeled clothing, members were "stirring the crowd" and talking to voters about flying to Ohio to promote President Barack Obama.
After watching what was occurring, Rockford approached Polling Supervisor Rose Cochran about what she was seeing.
"I went to the polling supervisor and let her know that it was not appropriate that they were in the building handing out water. She ignored me. I repeated my statement. She told me that she would handle it. She did nothing. I then went to the assistant supervisor and he stood up, walked over to another table and then sat down. I then walked into the waiting room and they were reloading another dolly with more cases of water," Rockford said in a True the Vote incident report.
After handing out water and advocating for President Obama, the NAACP members started handpicking and moving people to the front of a long voting line inside the polling place according to the incident report. After multiple complaints from voters about the line cutting, Rockford received a phone call from downtown telling her to “stand down.”
“All of the sudden one of the clerks, Dayan Cohen, said that someone wanted to speak to me on the phone. It was someone from downtown. I got on the phone and she said she was from downtown and that I needed to stand down and that it was okay for the NAACP to be within 100 ft. and they could hand out water. I told her that the NAACP was inside the building, wearing the NAACP clothing and caps and were handing out water and moving people from the back of the lines to the front of the lines,” Rockford said.
At this point, NAACP members were instructed to turn their clothing inside out, which they refused to do and said they weren’t going to stop their actions inside the polling place. Their behavior and actions to move people to the front of the line continued for the rest of the evening. Texas State Representative Sylvester Turner, a former Texas NAACP leader, was also seen outside the building talking with voters.
“The NAACP basically ran this poll location and the judges did nothing about it,” Rockford said.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Heaven or Hell ... Thanks Bob Looney!

If you are using a screen reader, you may wish to switch to basic HTML for a better experience.
>
> Heaven or Hell!
>
>
> While walking down the street one day a Corrupt Senator (that may be redundant) was hit by a bus and died.
>
> His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.
>
> "Welcome to heaven," said St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we 're not sure what to do with you."
>
>
> "No problem, just let me in," said the Senator.
>
> "Well, I 'd like to, but I have orders from the higher ups. What we 'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."
>
> "Really?, I 've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Senator.
>
>
> "I'm sorry, but we have our rules."
>
>
> And with that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell.
>
>
> The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course.
>
>
> In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.
>
>
> Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, andreminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people.
>
>
> They played a friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and the finest champagne.
>
>
> Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly guy who is having a good time dancing and telling jokes.
>
>
> They are all having such a good time that before the Senator realizes it, it is time to go.
>
>
> Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises.
>
>
> The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens in heaven where   St. Peter is waiting for him, "Now it 's time to visit heaven.”
>
>
> So, 24 hours passed with the Senator joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.
>
>
> "Well, then, you 've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."
>
>
> The Senator reflects for a minute, then he answers: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell."
>
>
> So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell...
>
>
> Now the doors of the elevator open and he 's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage.
>
> He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls to the ground.
>
>
> The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulders.
>
>
> "I don 't understand," stammers the Senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there 's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"
>
>
> The devil smiles at him and said,
> "Yesterday we were campaigning,
>
> Today, you voted.."
>
>
> Vote wisely on   November 6, 2012
>
>
>
>
>







Wednesday, August 15, 2012

JWR- Will a weakerned America defeat Paul Ryan?








Thanks Judi-  Great questions- I believe the Ameircan people will vote correctly in Nov. 2012!

Jewish World Review Aug 14, 2012 / 26 Menachem-Av, 5772
Home
Will a Weakened American Character Defeat Paul Ryan?
By Dennis Prager

Printer Friendly Version
Email this article
Share and bookmark this article



http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | The Republican vice-presidential candidate, Congressman Paul Ryan, is the Democrats' political version of the Anti-Christ. He believes in self-reliance; the left believes in reliance on the state. His moral values are shaped by religion (Catholicism); the left is frightened by religious Christian politicians (and athletes, and members of the armed forces, and talk show hosts, and, for that matter, clergy). He believes in individualism; the left believes in collectivism. He believes in small government and powerful citizens; the left believes in large government and dependent citizens.
Nevertheless, the Democratic Party claims to be overjoyed at his selection as the Republican vice-presidential nominee.
The Democrats' glee — even if exaggerated — emanates from their belief that Americans will reject Ryan's economic and social plans to reduce the American debt, unleash private economic growth (the only type there is), and reform unsustainable government programs such as Medicare.
Democrats believe that if Americans perceive that their entitlements may be affected — even if only beginning a decade from now, and even if the American debt is thereby cut by one third, and even if they, as well as the country, will ultimately benefit — so many Americans have become so used to government benefits, the Republicans stand little chance of winning the upcoming elections.
In other words, and tragically, the left and Democrats are relying on the decline of the American character that left-wing policies have produced (not only here but in Latin America, Europe, and everywhere else). The Democrats are hoping that older Americans are (irrationally) frightened by Medicare reform even though these reforms will not affect them, and that younger Americans will likewise reject these reforms because they are counting on receiving Medicare as it now exists.
Left-wing social policies are predicated on giving more and more Americans more and more benefits and demanding less and less from them.
The left's party, the Democratic Party, seeks to have the state pay for Americans' health care, give record numbers of Americans food stamps (now in a form similar to ATM and credit cards so that no stigma be involved), provide their children with school meals and provide women with child care and contraceptives, while enabling more and more Americans to pay no federal taxes to pay for any of these benefits.
The negative impact these policies have had on the character of Americans is indisputable. Every parent — and probably most adults who are not parents — knows what giving things they have not earned and demanding nothing from them in return produces: spoiled children.
Left-wing, Democratic Party policies have negatively impacted the American character in another way. Whenever possible, the left and the Democrats have de-stigmatized irresponsible behavior.
One example is women who give birth to and raise children without fathers in their children's lives. This past Sunday's New York Times opinion section featured another attack on those who stigmatize out of wedlock birth and single motherhood.
Another example is the cultural left's glorification of graffiti — once regarded as vandalism of public and private property — as "street art."
A third example is how difficult the Democratic Party and the left-wing education establishment have made it for teachers and principals to discipline disruptive and foul-mouthed students. The Department of Education has just declared education the "civil rights" issue of our generation" because black students are disproportionately suspended and otherwise punished by school officials. The effect? Black young people who abuse their teachers and schools feel empowered to continue their anti-social behavior.
At the same time, the left works to weaken the single most effective device for character building in American history: Judeo-Christian religions. Increasingly, the American motto "In God We Trust" has been replaced by "In Government We Trust" and "In Experts We Trust."
Since the Democrats could not win any national election with the votes of liberals alone — according to Gallup, self-described liberals constitute just 21 percent of the electorate — the great question of the 2012 American presidential election is this: Have the left and Democratic Party sufficiently weakened the character of enough Americans to enable the demonization of Paul Ryan to lead Barack Obama to victory?
I don't believe so. But given the enormity of the national debt incurred by this administration, its spectacular failure to improve the nation's economy, and its commitment to weakening American defense, if there were a better explanation for a Democratic victory, I would welcome it.

BUY DENNIS' LATEST BOOK
ClickHERE to purchase it at a 39% discount.
Or, in KINDLE edition at a 48% discount by clicking HERE
(Sales help fund JWR.).

JWR contributor Dennis Prager hosts a national daily radio show based in Los Angeles. Click hereto comment on this column.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Krauthammer-The case against re-election Thanks Ramey H.!


---------------------------
Charles Krauthammer

The Case Against Re-election

By Charles Krauthammer,

Washington Post

Published: August 9, 2012

There are two ways to run against Barack Obama: stewardship or ideology. You can run against his record or you can run against his ideas.
The stewardship case is pretty straightforward: the worst recovery in U.S. history, 42 consecutive months of 8-plus percent unemployment, declining economic growthall achieved at a price of an additional $5 trillion of accumulated debt.
The ideological case is also simple. Just play in toto (and therefore in context) Obama’s Roanoke riff telling small-business owners: You didn’t build that.” Real credit for your success belongs not to you — you think you did well because of your smarts and sweat? he asked mockingly — but to government that built the infrastructure without which you would have nothing.
Play it. Then ask: Is that the governing philosophy you want for this nation?
Mitt Romney’s preferred argument, however, is stewardship. Are you better off today than you were $5 trillion ago? Look at the wreckage around you. This presidency is a failure. I’m a successful businessman. I know how to fix things. Elect me, etc. etc.
Easy peasy, but highly risky. If you run against Obama’s performance in contrast to your own competence, you stake your case on persona. Is that how you want to compete against an opponent who is not just more likable and immeasurably cooler but spending millions to paint you as an unfeeling, out-of-touch, job-killing, private-equity plutocrat?
The ideological case, on the other hand, is not just appealing to a center-right country with twice as many conservatives as liberals, it is also explanatory. It underpins the stewardship argument. Obama’s ideology — and the program that followedexplains the failure of these four years.
What program? Obama laid it out boldly in a series of major addresses during the first months of his presidency. The roots of the nation’s crisis, he declared, were systemic. Fundamental change was required. He had come to deliver it. Hence his signature legislation:
First, the $831 billion stimulus that was going to “reinvest” in America and bring unemployment below 6 percent. We know about the unemployment. And the investment? Obama loves to cite great federal projects such as the Hoover Dam and the interstate highway system. Fine. Name one thing of any note created by Obama’s Niagara of borrowed money. A modernized electric grid? Ports dredged to receive the larger ships soon to traverse a widened Panama Canal? Nothing of the sort. Solyndra, anyone?
Second, radical reform of health care that would reduce its ruinously accelerating cost: “Put simply,” he said, “our health-care problem is our deficit problem” — a financial hemorrhage drowning us in debt.
Except that Obamacare adds to spending. The Congressional Budget Office reports that Obamacare will incur $1.68 trillion of new expenditures in its first decade. To say nothing of the price of the uncertainty introduced by an impossibly complex remaking of one-sixth of the economy discouraging hiring and expansion as trillions of investable private-sector dollars remain sidelined.
The third part of Obama’s promised transformation was energy. His cap-and-trade federal takeover was rejected by his own Democrat Senate. So the war on fossil fuels has been conducted unilaterally by bureaucratic fiat. Regulations that will kill coal. A no-brainer pipeline (Keystone) rejected lest Canadian oil sands be burned. (China will burn them instead.) A drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico that a federal judge severely criticized as illegal.
That was the program — now so unpopular that Obama barely mentions it.
· Obamacare got exactly two lines in this year’s State of the Union address.
· Seen any ads touting the stimulus?
· The drilling moratorium?
· The Keystone pipeline ban?
Ideas matter. The 2010 election, the most ideological since 1980, saw the voters resoundingly reject a Democrat Party that relentlessly was expanding the power, spending, scope and reach of government.
It’s worse now. Those who have struggled to create a family business, a corner restaurant, a medical practice won’t take kindly to being told that their success is a result of government-built roads and bridges.
In 1988, Michael Dukakis famously said, “This election is not about ideology; it’s about competence.” He lost. If Republicans want to win, Obama’s deeply revealing, teleprompter-free you-didn’t-build-that confession of faith needs to be hung around his neck until Election Day.
The third consecutive summer-of-recovery-that-never-came is attributable not just to Obama being in over his head but, even more important, to what’s in his head: a government-centered vision of the economy and society, and the policies that flow from it.
Four years of that and this is what you get.
Make the [ideological] case and you win the White House.
-----------------------------------
Dr. Krauthammer writes a politics column that runs on Fridays.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Jon McNaughton's great paintings



There are actually two pictures. After the first video plays, you must click on the link to see the new painting!


THE TRUTH REPRESENTED BY A PAINTING

It took guts to paint this picture, he will probably pay a big price...

Watch this short video!

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/09.10/forgottenman.html

If this won't open from my blog or email, please go to Google Jon McNaughton's paintings- SamKat

Blog Definition

On Line Blog Definition
Google-Blog Definitionblog, short for web log, an online, regularly updated journal or newsletter that is readily accessible to the general public by virtue of being posted on a website.