Glenn Beck is detestable to little o.
David Horowitz' parents were avowed communists and David was a radical activist of earlier years. David has become a conservative jewish man.
David told Glenn that radicals seek one thing above all and that is POWER.
The radicals are now basking in the power of this narcissistic PUSA.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Dr. Hovermale- 3rd grade Lesson in [politics
And now we know.
THE COW AND THE ICE CREAM
ONE OF THE BEST EXPLANATIONS
OF WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION
From a teacher in the Nashville area
"We are worried about "the cow" when it is all about the "Ice Cream"
The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade this year.
The presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest.
I decided we would have an election for a class president.
We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote.
To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members.
We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have.
We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot.
The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids.
I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support.
I had never seen Olivia's mother.
The day arrived when they were to make their speeches.
Jamie went first.
He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better
place. He ended by promising to do his very best.
Everyone applauded and he sat down.
Now is was Olivia's turn to speak.
Her speech was concise.
She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream."
She sat down.
The class went wild. "Yes! Yes!
We want ice cream."
She surely would say more. She did not have to.
A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream?
She wasn't sure.
Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it.
She didn't know.
The class really didn't care.
All they were thinking about was ice cream.
Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a landslide.
Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he offered ice cream and
52 percent of the people reacted like nine year olds.
They want ice cream.
The other 48 percent know
they're going to have to feed the cow and clean up the mess."
Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone ---
that they have not first taken away from someone else.
THE COW AND THE ICE CREAM
ONE OF THE BEST EXPLANATIONS
OF WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION
From a teacher in the Nashville area
"We are worried about "the cow" when it is all about the "Ice Cream"
The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade this year.
The presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest.
I decided we would have an election for a class president.
We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote.
To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members.
We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have.
We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot.
The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids.
I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support.
I had never seen Olivia's mother.
The day arrived when they were to make their speeches.
Jamie went first.
He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better
place. He ended by promising to do his very best.
Everyone applauded and he sat down.
Now is was Olivia's turn to speak.
Her speech was concise.
She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream."
She sat down.
The class went wild. "Yes! Yes!
We want ice cream."
She surely would say more. She did not have to.
A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream?
She wasn't sure.
Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it.
She didn't know.
The class really didn't care.
All they were thinking about was ice cream.
Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a landslide.
Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he offered ice cream and
52 percent of the people reacted like nine year olds.
They want ice cream.
The other 48 percent know
they're going to have to feed the cow and clean up the mess."
Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone ---
that they have not first taken away from someone else.
James Cook Why seniors are leaving AARP
Our power hungry "elitist representatives had better start listening to the American patriots. Thanks James!
----- Original Message -----
From: JAMES C COOK
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: FW: Several reasons why seniors are leaving AARP...
Thanks...I'm now a bona fide member of Amac...A conservative mature membership...Barf to AARP.
Subject: Several reasons why seniors are leaving AARP...
I haven't been a member since they supported taxing Social Security Benefits!!!!!!
This letter was actually sent to A. Barry Rand, Executive Director of
AARP in response to a plea for them to renew a lapsed membership (You
can verify the letter on SNOPES Urban Legends site, search for
"letter to AARP".)
Dear Mr. Rand,
Recently you sent us a letter encouraging us to renew our lapsed
membership in AARP by the requested date. I know it is not what you
were looking for, but this is the most honest response I can give you.
Our gap in coverage is merely a microscopic symptom of the real
problem, a deepening lack of faith.
While we have proudly maintained our membership for several years and
have long admired the AARP goals and principles, regrettably, we can
no longer endorse it's abdication of our values. Your letter
specifically stated that we can count on AARP to speak up for our
rights, yet the voice we hear is not ours. Your offer of being kept up
to date on important issues through DIVIDED WE FAIL presents neither
an impartial view nor the one we have come to embrace. We do believe
that when two parties agree all the time on everything presented to
them, one is probably not necessary. But, when the opinions and long
term goals are diametrically opposed, the divorce is imminent. This is
the philosophy which spawned our 200 years of government.
Once upon a time, we looked forward to being part of the senior
demographic. We also looked to AARP to provide certain benefits and
give our voice a power we could not possibly hope to achieve on our
own. AARP gave us a sense of belonging which we no longer enjoy. The
socialist politics practiced by the Obama administration and empowered
by AARP serves only to raise the blood pressure my medical insurance
strives to contain. Clearly a conflict of interest there!
We do not understand the AARP posture, feel greatly betrayed by the
guiding forces whom we expected to map out our senior years, and leave
your ranks with a great sense of regret. We mitigate that
disappointment with the relief of knowing that we are not contributing
to the problem anymore by renewing our membership. There are numerous
other organizations which offer discounts without threatening our way
of life or offending our sensibilities.
This presidential administration scares the living daylights out of
us. Not just for ourselves, but for our proud and blood-stained
heritage, but even more importantly for our children and
grandchildren. Washington has rendered 'Soylent Green' a prophetic
cautionary tale rather than a nonfiction scare tactic. I have never in
my life endorsed any militant or radical groups, yet now I find myself
listening to them. I don't have to agree with them to appreciate the
fear which birthed their existence. Their borderline insanity presents
little more than a balance to the voice of the socialist mindset in
power.
Perhaps I became American by a great stroke of luck in some cosmic
uterine lottery, but in my adulthood I CHOOSE to embrace it and
nurture the freedoms it represents as well as the responsibilities it
requires.
Your website generously offers us the opportunity to receive all
communication in Spanish. ARE YOU KIDDING??? Someone has broken into
our 'house', invaded our home without our invitation or consent. The
President has insisted we keep the perpetrator in comfort and learn
the perp's language so we can communicate our reluctant welcome to them.
I DON'T choose to welcome them.
I DON'T choose to support them.
I DON'T choose to educate them.
I DON'T choose to medicate them, pay for their food or clothing.
American home invaders get arrested.
Please explain to me why foreign lawbreakers can enjoy privileges on
American soil that Americans do not get? Why do some immigrants have
to play the game to be welcomed, and others only have to break & enter
to be welcomed?
We travel for a living. Walt hauls horses all over this great country,
averaging over 10,000 miles a month when he is out there. He meets
more people than a politician on caffeine overdose. Of all the many
good folks he enjoyed on this last 10,000 miles, this trip yielded
only ONE supporter of the current administration. One of us is out of
touch with mainstream America. Since our poll is conducted without
funding, I have more faith in it than one which is power driven.
We have decided to forward this to everyone on our mailing list, and
will encourage them to do the same. With several hundred in my address
book, I have every faith that the eventual exponential factor will
make a credible statement to you. I am disappointed as hell. I am
scared as hell.
I am MAD as hell, and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!
Walt & Cyndy
Miller Farms Equine Transport
We're NOT renewing our membership, either...
--
Carroll J. Sutton
(217)529-9222 - Home
(217)725-9222 - Cell
(217)529-9888 - Fax
----- Original Message -----
From: JAMES C COOK
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: FW: Several reasons why seniors are leaving AARP...
Thanks...I'm now a bona fide member of Amac...A conservative mature membership...Barf to AARP.
Subject: Several reasons why seniors are leaving AARP...
I haven't been a member since they supported taxing Social Security Benefits!!!!!!
This letter was actually sent to A. Barry Rand, Executive Director of
AARP in response to a plea for them to renew a lapsed membership (You
can verify the letter on SNOPES Urban Legends site, search for
"letter to AARP".)
Dear Mr. Rand,
Recently you sent us a letter encouraging us to renew our lapsed
membership in AARP by the requested date. I know it is not what you
were looking for, but this is the most honest response I can give you.
Our gap in coverage is merely a microscopic symptom of the real
problem, a deepening lack of faith.
While we have proudly maintained our membership for several years and
have long admired the AARP goals and principles, regrettably, we can
no longer endorse it's abdication of our values. Your letter
specifically stated that we can count on AARP to speak up for our
rights, yet the voice we hear is not ours. Your offer of being kept up
to date on important issues through DIVIDED WE FAIL presents neither
an impartial view nor the one we have come to embrace. We do believe
that when two parties agree all the time on everything presented to
them, one is probably not necessary. But, when the opinions and long
term goals are diametrically opposed, the divorce is imminent. This is
the philosophy which spawned our 200 years of government.
Once upon a time, we looked forward to being part of the senior
demographic. We also looked to AARP to provide certain benefits and
give our voice a power we could not possibly hope to achieve on our
own. AARP gave us a sense of belonging which we no longer enjoy. The
socialist politics practiced by the Obama administration and empowered
by AARP serves only to raise the blood pressure my medical insurance
strives to contain. Clearly a conflict of interest there!
We do not understand the AARP posture, feel greatly betrayed by the
guiding forces whom we expected to map out our senior years, and leave
your ranks with a great sense of regret. We mitigate that
disappointment with the relief of knowing that we are not contributing
to the problem anymore by renewing our membership. There are numerous
other organizations which offer discounts without threatening our way
of life or offending our sensibilities.
This presidential administration scares the living daylights out of
us. Not just for ourselves, but for our proud and blood-stained
heritage, but even more importantly for our children and
grandchildren. Washington has rendered 'Soylent Green' a prophetic
cautionary tale rather than a nonfiction scare tactic. I have never in
my life endorsed any militant or radical groups, yet now I find myself
listening to them. I don't have to agree with them to appreciate the
fear which birthed their existence. Their borderline insanity presents
little more than a balance to the voice of the socialist mindset in
power.
Perhaps I became American by a great stroke of luck in some cosmic
uterine lottery, but in my adulthood I CHOOSE to embrace it and
nurture the freedoms it represents as well as the responsibilities it
requires.
Your website generously offers us the opportunity to receive all
communication in Spanish. ARE YOU KIDDING??? Someone has broken into
our 'house', invaded our home without our invitation or consent. The
President has insisted we keep the perpetrator in comfort and learn
the perp's language so we can communicate our reluctant welcome to them.
I DON'T choose to welcome them.
I DON'T choose to support them.
I DON'T choose to educate them.
I DON'T choose to medicate them, pay for their food or clothing.
American home invaders get arrested.
Please explain to me why foreign lawbreakers can enjoy privileges on
American soil that Americans do not get? Why do some immigrants have
to play the game to be welcomed, and others only have to break & enter
to be welcomed?
We travel for a living. Walt hauls horses all over this great country,
averaging over 10,000 miles a month when he is out there. He meets
more people than a politician on caffeine overdose. Of all the many
good folks he enjoyed on this last 10,000 miles, this trip yielded
only ONE supporter of the current administration. One of us is out of
touch with mainstream America. Since our poll is conducted without
funding, I have more faith in it than one which is power driven.
We have decided to forward this to everyone on our mailing list, and
will encourage them to do the same. With several hundred in my address
book, I have every faith that the eventual exponential factor will
make a credible statement to you. I am disappointed as hell. I am
scared as hell.
I am MAD as hell, and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!
Walt & Cyndy
Miller Farms Equine Transport
We're NOT renewing our membership, either...
--
Carroll J. Sutton
(217)529-9222 - Home
(217)725-9222 - Cell
(217)529-9888 - Fax
Thanks James C. Cook.
The rules murdering our troops
By RALPH PETERS
Last Updated: 2:55 AM, September 24, 2009
Posted: 12:57 AM, September 24, 2009
When enemy action kills our troops, it's unfortunate. When our own moral fecklessness murders those in uniform, it's unforgivable.
In Afghanistan, our leaders are complicit in the death of each soldier, Marine or Navy corpsman who falls because politically correct rules of engagement shield our enemies.
Mission-focused, but morally oblivious, Gen. Stan McChrystal conformed to the Obama Way of War by imposing rules of engagement that could have been concocted by Code Pink:
* Unless our troops in combat are absolutely certain that no civilians are present, they're denied artillery or air support. WHAT?
* If any civilians appear where we meet the Taliban, our troops are to "break contact" -- to retreat. SHAMEFUL
CAN YOU IMAGINE EISENHOWER ISSUING THESE SAME ROE TO OUR TROOPS IN WW2 OR KOREA?
These ROE are a cave-in to the Taliban's shameless propaganda campaign that claimed innocents were massacred every time our aircraft appeared overhead. (Afghan President Mohammed Karzai and our establishment media backed the terrorists.)
The Taliban's goal was to level the playing field -- to deny our troops their technological edge. Our enemies more than succeeded.
And what has our concern for the lives of Taliban sympathizers accomplished? The Taliban now make damned sure that civilians are present whenever they conduct an ambush or operation.
So they attack -- and we quit the fight, lugging our dead and wounded back to base.
We've been through this b.s. before. In Iraq, we wanted to show respect to our enemies, so the generals announced early on that we wouldn't enter mosques. The result? Hundreds of mosques became terrorist safe houses, bomb factories and weapons caches.
Why is this so hard to figure out? We tell our enemies we won't attack X. So they exploit X. Who wouldn't?
It isn't just that war is hell. It's that war must be hell, otherwise why would the enemy ever quit?
This week's rumblings from the White House suggest that we may, at last, see a revised strategy that concentrates on killing our deadliest enemies -- but I'll believe it when I see the rounds go down-range.
Meanwhile, our troops die because our leaders are moral cowards.
Over the decades, political correctness insinuated itself into the ranks of our "Washington player" generals and admirals. We now have four-stars who believe that improving our enemies' self-esteem is a crucial wartime goal.
And the Army published its disastrous Counterinsurgency Manual a few years back -- doctrine written by military intellectuals who, instead of listening to Infantry squad leaders, made a show of consulting "peace advocates" and "humanitarian workers." (Obviously Harvard indocrinated Liberals who never wore a military uniform)
The result was a manual based on a few heavily edited case studies "proving" that the key to success in fighting terrorists is to hand out soccer balls to worm-eaten children. The doctrine ignored the brutal lessons of 3,000 years of history -- because history isn't politically correct (it shows, relentlessly, that the only effective way to fight faith-fueled insurgents is with fire and sword).
The New York Times lavished praise on the manual. What does that tell you? (surrender and appeasement)
A few senior officers continue to push me to "lay off" the Counterinsurgency Manual. Sorry, but I'm more concerned about supporting the youngest private on patrol than I am with the reputation of any general.
As a real general put it a century ago, "The purpose of an Army is to fight." And the purpose of going to war is to win (that dirty word). It's not to sacrifice our own troops to make sad-sack do-gooders back home feel good.
We need to recognize that true morality lies in backing our troops, not in letting them die for whacko Liberal theories.
The next time you read about the death of a soldier or Marine in Afghanistan, don't just blame the Taliban. Blame the generals and politicians who sent them to war, then took away their weapons, (tied their hands and surrendered)
Ralph Peters' new novel is "The War After Armageddon."
IN MY OPINION, IF THESE ROE ARE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE IN THEATER,
I QUESTION WHY THE HECK ARE WE THERE? LET'S STOP WASTING AMERICAN LIVES AND LIMBS
AND GET OUT. EITHER LET LOOSE THE MILITARY POWER OF OUR NATION AND CLEAN OUT THIS
NEST OF TERRORISTS AND CORRUPTION OR LEAVE. LET KARZAI AND HIS CORRUPT GOVT, AND
DRUG SMUGGLING WAR LORD BUDDIES, FIGHT.
STOP WASTING AMERICAN TREASURE AND LIVES TO STOP DRUG INTERDICTION WHICH IS WHAT
WE ARE DOING. WE ARE ONLY FIGHTING THE TALIBAN BECAUSE THEY ARE EXPLOITING THE
DRUG TRADE OF AFGHANISTAN AND WE ARE INTERFERING WITH KARZAI, THE DRUG LORDS
AND THE TALIBAN FROM THEIR SOURCE OF INCOME.
By RALPH PETERS
Last Updated: 2:55 AM, September 24, 2009
Posted: 12:57 AM, September 24, 2009
When enemy action kills our troops, it's unfortunate. When our own moral fecklessness murders those in uniform, it's unforgivable.
In Afghanistan, our leaders are complicit in the death of each soldier, Marine or Navy corpsman who falls because politically correct rules of engagement shield our enemies.
Mission-focused, but morally oblivious, Gen. Stan McChrystal conformed to the Obama Way of War by imposing rules of engagement that could have been concocted by Code Pink:
* Unless our troops in combat are absolutely certain that no civilians are present, they're denied artillery or air support. WHAT?
* If any civilians appear where we meet the Taliban, our troops are to "break contact" -- to retreat. SHAMEFUL
CAN YOU IMAGINE EISENHOWER ISSUING THESE SAME ROE TO OUR TROOPS IN WW2 OR KOREA?
These ROE are a cave-in to the Taliban's shameless propaganda campaign that claimed innocents were massacred every time our aircraft appeared overhead. (Afghan President Mohammed Karzai and our establishment media backed the terrorists.)
The Taliban's goal was to level the playing field -- to deny our troops their technological edge. Our enemies more than succeeded.
And what has our concern for the lives of Taliban sympathizers accomplished? The Taliban now make damned sure that civilians are present whenever they conduct an ambush or operation.
So they attack -- and we quit the fight, lugging our dead and wounded back to base.
We've been through this b.s. before. In Iraq, we wanted to show respect to our enemies, so the generals announced early on that we wouldn't enter mosques. The result? Hundreds of mosques became terrorist safe houses, bomb factories and weapons caches.
Why is this so hard to figure out? We tell our enemies we won't attack X. So they exploit X. Who wouldn't?
It isn't just that war is hell. It's that war must be hell, otherwise why would the enemy ever quit?
This week's rumblings from the White House suggest that we may, at last, see a revised strategy that concentrates on killing our deadliest enemies -- but I'll believe it when I see the rounds go down-range.
Meanwhile, our troops die because our leaders are moral cowards.
Over the decades, political correctness insinuated itself into the ranks of our "Washington player" generals and admirals. We now have four-stars who believe that improving our enemies' self-esteem is a crucial wartime goal.
And the Army published its disastrous Counterinsurgency Manual a few years back -- doctrine written by military intellectuals who, instead of listening to Infantry squad leaders, made a show of consulting "peace advocates" and "humanitarian workers." (Obviously Harvard indocrinated Liberals who never wore a military uniform)
The result was a manual based on a few heavily edited case studies "proving" that the key to success in fighting terrorists is to hand out soccer balls to worm-eaten children. The doctrine ignored the brutal lessons of 3,000 years of history -- because history isn't politically correct (it shows, relentlessly, that the only effective way to fight faith-fueled insurgents is with fire and sword).
The New York Times lavished praise on the manual. What does that tell you? (surrender and appeasement)
A few senior officers continue to push me to "lay off" the Counterinsurgency Manual. Sorry, but I'm more concerned about supporting the youngest private on patrol than I am with the reputation of any general.
As a real general put it a century ago, "The purpose of an Army is to fight." And the purpose of going to war is to win (that dirty word). It's not to sacrifice our own troops to make sad-sack do-gooders back home feel good.
We need to recognize that true morality lies in backing our troops, not in letting them die for whacko Liberal theories.
The next time you read about the death of a soldier or Marine in Afghanistan, don't just blame the Taliban. Blame the generals and politicians who sent them to war, then took away their weapons, (tied their hands and surrendered)
Ralph Peters' new novel is "The War After Armageddon."
IN MY OPINION, IF THESE ROE ARE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE IN THEATER,
I QUESTION WHY THE HECK ARE WE THERE? LET'S STOP WASTING AMERICAN LIVES AND LIMBS
AND GET OUT. EITHER LET LOOSE THE MILITARY POWER OF OUR NATION AND CLEAN OUT THIS
NEST OF TERRORISTS AND CORRUPTION OR LEAVE. LET KARZAI AND HIS CORRUPT GOVT, AND
DRUG SMUGGLING WAR LORD BUDDIES, FIGHT.
STOP WASTING AMERICAN TREASURE AND LIVES TO STOP DRUG INTERDICTION WHICH IS WHAT
WE ARE DOING. WE ARE ONLY FIGHTING THE TALIBAN BECAUSE THEY ARE EXPLOITING THE
DRUG TRADE OF AFGHANISTAN AND WE ARE INTERFERING WITH KARZAI, THE DRUG LORDS
AND THE TALIBAN FROM THEIR SOURCE OF INCOME.
Lou Flores says "Please Read"
No COLA for seniors and Medicare increasing. These moves are tax increases for seniors.
Please read For the first time in history, the Democratic Congress will not allow an increase in the social security COLA (cost of living adjustment). In fact, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation predicts there may not be any COLA for the next three years. However, the per person monthly Medicare insurance premium will be increased from the 2009 premium of $96.40 to $104.20 in 2010 and to $120.20 for the year
2011. Send this to all seniors and everyone that you know they will be seniors one day. Remind them to not vote for the incumbent senators and congressmen in the 2010 and the 2012 elections.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Please read For the first time in history, the Democratic Congress will not allow an increase in the social security COLA (cost of living adjustment). In fact, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation predicts there may not be any COLA for the next three years. However, the per person monthly Medicare insurance premium will be increased from the 2009 premium of $96.40 to $104.20 in 2010 and to $120.20 for the year
2011. Send this to all seniors and everyone that you know they will be seniors one day. Remind them to not vote for the incumbent senators and congressmen in the 2010 and the 2012 elections.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Saturday, September 26, 2009
World's shortest books- Ramey Hoskins
______________________________________________
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT MY COUNTRY by Jane Fonda & Cindy Sheehan. Illustrated by Michael Moore
________________________________________
MY CHRISTIAN ACCOMPLISHMENTS & HOW I HELPED AFTER KATRINA by Rev Jesse Jackson & Rev Al Sharpton
_______________________________________
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT BILL by Hillary Clinton
________________________________
Sequel: THINGS I LOVE ABOUT HILLARY By Bill Clinton
___________________________________
MY LITTLE BOOK OF PERSONAL HYGIENE by Osama Bin Laden
___________________________________
THINGS I CANNOT AFFORD by Bill Gates
____________________________________
THINGS I WOULD NOT DO FOR MONEY by Dennis Rodman
_________________________________
THINGS WE KNOW TO BE TRUE by Al Gore & John Kerry
_____________________________________
AMELIA EARHART'S GUIDE TO THE PACIFIC
___________________________________
A COLLECTION of MOTIVATIONAL SPEECHES by Dr. J.. Kevorkian
__________________________________
ALL THE MEN WE HAVE LOVED, BEFORE ..... by Ellen de Generes & Rosie O'Donnel
____________________________________
GUIDE TO DATING ETIQUETTE by Mike Tyson
__________________________________
THE AMISH PHONE DIRECTORY
_______________________________________
MY PLAN TO FIND THE REAL KILLERS by O. J. Simpson
_________________________________________
HOW TO DRINK & DRIVE OVER BRIDGES by Ted Kennedy
___________________________________
MY BOOK OF MORALS by Bill Clinton with introduction by the Rev. Jesse Jackson
*******************************************************
AND, JUST ADDED: Complete Knowledge of Military Strategy! By Nancy Pelosi
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT MY COUNTRY by Jane Fonda & Cindy Sheehan. Illustrated by Michael Moore
________________________________________
MY CHRISTIAN ACCOMPLISHMENTS & HOW I HELPED AFTER KATRINA by Rev Jesse Jackson & Rev Al Sharpton
_______________________________________
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT BILL by Hillary Clinton
________________________________
Sequel: THINGS I LOVE ABOUT HILLARY By Bill Clinton
___________________________________
MY LITTLE BOOK OF PERSONAL HYGIENE by Osama Bin Laden
___________________________________
THINGS I CANNOT AFFORD by Bill Gates
____________________________________
THINGS I WOULD NOT DO FOR MONEY by Dennis Rodman
_________________________________
THINGS WE KNOW TO BE TRUE by Al Gore & John Kerry
_____________________________________
AMELIA EARHART'S GUIDE TO THE PACIFIC
___________________________________
A COLLECTION of MOTIVATIONAL SPEECHES by Dr. J.. Kevorkian
__________________________________
ALL THE MEN WE HAVE LOVED, BEFORE ..... by Ellen de Generes & Rosie O'Donnel
____________________________________
GUIDE TO DATING ETIQUETTE by Mike Tyson
__________________________________
THE AMISH PHONE DIRECTORY
_______________________________________
MY PLAN TO FIND THE REAL KILLERS by O. J. Simpson
_________________________________________
HOW TO DRINK & DRIVE OVER BRIDGES by Ted Kennedy
___________________________________
MY BOOK OF MORALS by Bill Clinton with introduction by the Rev. Jesse Jackson
*******************************************************
AND, JUST ADDED: Complete Knowledge of Military Strategy! By Nancy Pelosi
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
I believe he is aware that he is doing osama's bidding, Ramey.
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: ramey hoskins
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Fw: Unaware Obama
An excellent post from Iowntheworld.com
I have no idea if Jess Reed is a real person or not.
It’s not the messenger that is important – it’s the message. And it doesn’t get better than this!
The Audacity of Unawareness
Barack Obama, through his spokesman, claimed that he was unaware of the tax day tea parties. But how out of touch is the Community Organizer in Chief, really?
This much.
- He was unaware that he was attending a church (for 20 years) with a racist pastor who hates America.
- He was unaware that he was family friends with and started his political career in the living room of a domestic terrorist.
- He was unaware that he had invested in two speculative companies backed by some of his top donors right after taking office in 2005.
- He was unaware that his own aunt was living in the U.S. illegally.
- He was unaware that his own brother lives on pennies a day in a hut in Kenya.
- He was unaware of the AIG bonuses that he and his administration approved and signed into a bill.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Commerce was under investigation in a bribery scandal.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Health and Human Services was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of the Treasury was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be the U.S. Trade Representative was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the woman he nominated to be his Chief Performance Officer was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be #2 at the Environmental Protection Agency was under investigation for mismanaging $25 million in EPA grants.
For the love of God, there are people in comas that are more aware of world affairs than this smooth talking, village idiot.
Jess L. Reed
USNavy/Retired
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: ramey hoskins
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Fw: Unaware Obama
An excellent post from Iowntheworld.com
I have no idea if Jess Reed is a real person or not.
It’s not the messenger that is important – it’s the message. And it doesn’t get better than this!
The Audacity of Unawareness
Barack Obama, through his spokesman, claimed that he was unaware of the tax day tea parties. But how out of touch is the Community Organizer in Chief, really?
This much.
- He was unaware that he was attending a church (for 20 years) with a racist pastor who hates America.
- He was unaware that he was family friends with and started his political career in the living room of a domestic terrorist.
- He was unaware that he had invested in two speculative companies backed by some of his top donors right after taking office in 2005.
- He was unaware that his own aunt was living in the U.S. illegally.
- He was unaware that his own brother lives on pennies a day in a hut in Kenya.
- He was unaware of the AIG bonuses that he and his administration approved and signed into a bill.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Commerce was under investigation in a bribery scandal.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Health and Human Services was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of the Treasury was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be the U.S. Trade Representative was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the woman he nominated to be his Chief Performance Officer was a tax cheat.
- He was unaware that the man he nominated to be #2 at the Environmental Protection Agency was under investigation for mismanaging $25 million in EPA grants.
For the love of God, there are people in comas that are more aware of world affairs than this smooth talking, village idiot.
Jess L. Reed
USNavy/Retired
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)