Jonah Goldberg commentary: Millennials will grow and, likely, change
Monday March 17, 2014 6:12 AM
In case you hadn’t heard, young people — aka “the millennials” — are the most cynical and
distrusting generation ever recorded. Only 19 percent think most people can be trusted. According
to a study from the Pew Research Center, they are less attached to marriage, religion and political
institutions than Gen Xers, baby boomers and the other demographic flavors journalists love to use.
They like their friends, their digital “social networks” and their toys, and that’s about it. Not
even a majority will call themselves “patriotic.” Probably more dismaying for liberals: Of any
living generation, they are the least likely to call themselves environmentalists.
Now, I often find generational stereotyping annoying. For instance, there was no “greatest
generation.” Sure, there were a bunch of great Americans who stormed the beaches of Normandy. But
is some guy who was in jail in 1943 for petty larceny deserving of respect because he was born
around the same time as a guy who won the Medal of Honor during WWII?
Honor, glory and respect are earned individually, not collectively.
Politicians pander to young people, and lots of young people fall for it. And that speaks well
of neither. Politicians pander to “youth” because it’s a time-saving way to trawl for votes and
volunteer door-knockers wholesale. It’s the difference between using a gill net and a fishing pole.
“You’re great because you were born more recently than other people” is the lamest form of flattery
I can think of.
When politicians invoke generational stereotypes, what they are really doing is saying, “Act
your age.” What’s pathetic is when young people unwittingly follow that advice.
For example, Barack Obama won the youth vote by huge margins in 2008 (66 percent among
under-30s) and 2012 (60 percent). He did this in no small part by pandering to the vanity of young
people. Sure, he addressed “youth issues” such as student loans. Yes, he also mirrored their views
on some social issues (though not gay marriage in ’08). Obama’s ambivalence toward seemingly
clichéd patriotic gestures (remember the endless controversy about whether he would wear a flag
pin?) sent an important signal to young voters raised on the snark of
The Daily Show and weary of talk of “freedom fries.”
But the overall gestalt was more about fostering a sense of inclusion in a “movement” of some
kind; “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” and all of that nonsense. Obama promised that
government could be the vehicle that would carry us to the sunny uplands of history. He took the
aesthetic of a Pepsi marketing rollout and pasted it onto a presidential campaign.
But, as Mario Cuomo once said, politicians campaign in poetry but govern in prose. And the prose
of the Obama years has been an incoherent and disillusioning run-on sentence. His signature
achievement, Obamacare, was designed from the outset to screw young people, overcharging them for
products they don’t need in order to subsidize older Americans. Young people loved it when Obama
called George W. Bush’s deficits “unpatriotic” because they saddled millennials with debt. That was
$7 trillion borrowed dollars ago.
“Idealistic” Democrats have spent the Obama years circling the wagons around parasitic teachers
unions at the expense of poor minority kids (rich people have school choice already). The
shovel-ready jobs were a fraudulent talking point used to justify pouring money into constituencies
that already have jobs. Obama is hell-bent on raising the minimum wage, which will help people with
jobs — particularly well-paying union jobs that tie compensation to multiples of the minimum wage.
But it won’t help young people get their first jobs, which are harder to find these days than legal
weed.
Senate Democrats just held an utterly bogus pseudo-filibuster on global warming against a
legislative body they control. They proposed no legislation, preferring instead to put on a kabuki
show for rich donors justifiably wondering what Obama’s “Year of Action” actually means.
It’s true, millennials remain more liberal and look more favorably toward big government than
other age groups. But people grow up. They may well learn that their cynicism towards marriage and
God — time-honored sources of happiness — was misplaced as the single life gets old and they find
the one or the One they were waiting for.
Similarly, the hot embers of their ardor for big government may cool as they realize the poetry
rarely gets translated into prose. And for that, Barack Obama will deserve a fair share of the
credit. For nothing breeds disillusionment and cynicism more than the failure to deliver.
Jonah Goldberg is editor at large of National Review Online.
jonahscolumn@aol.com