Remember this place
http://www.youtube.com/watch?Monday, March 10, 2014
How wonderful! Dreamland Pool Portsmnouth OH ..., Thanks Fred R, George K., and Clay V!
DREAMLAND - YouTube
Remember this place
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
|
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
|
LHL "Chippiness" not a great part of game ... Right Coach Mitchell!
UK women's notes: 4 technicals in 'chippy' match vs. Tennessee
jsmith3@herald-leader.comMarch 9, 2014 Updated 2 hours ago
Tennessee's Cierra Burdick had her shot blocked by UK's
Samarie Walker, left, and DeNesha Stallworth. "Chippiness happens," said
Burdick, who also earned a second-half technical.
JASON GETZ — AP
DULUTH, Ga. — Championship games between familiar foes are rarely friendly.
But Kentucky Coach Matthew Mitchell thought the Southeastern Conference championship game with Tennessee got a little too chippy, including a pair of double technicals in the second half that he thought altered the game.
"I was very disappointed in how that affected the game," Mitchell said. "It could have been stopped much earlier than it boiling over and affecting the game."
Mitchell and his UK players said the "activity" started before the game with trash talking from Lady Vols junior forward Cierra Burdick and continued throughout.
"It's not the first time that's happened with that player," Mitchell said, noting that he mentioned it to the officials repeated times. "So you watch film. You see how players act. So I noticed it early on. It's a loud arena. It's a tough game. I guess they didn't see it."
The frustrations boiled over into double technicals for Samarie Walker and Burdick with 8:35 to go and UK up 51-50.
"She said something to one of my teammates; I said something back," Walker said. "That kind of made it worse."
The first issue turned into another round of double technicals for DeNesha Stallworth and Jasmine Jones.
"That's not what I wanted to see in the SEC championship game," Mitchell continued. "I'd rather see two teams play, not have a bunch of talking, yapping, unsportsmanlike conduct, but that's what it ended up being."
Burdick was asked about it after the Lady Vols' 71-70 win in The Arena at Gwinnett Center and she shrugged it off.
"I don't remember making contact with anybody," she said. "It's a physical game.
"Chippiness happens. It happens. This is basketball. It happens every single day. I think the refs did a fine job of avoiding any altercations. Nothing happened. Words were said, but words are words. No actions took place."
Tennessee Coach Holly Warlick said she didn't notice what Mitchell said he was seeing before and during the game.
"I just wanted us to compete," she said. "I thought that's what we were doing."
Waiting game begins
Kentucky doesn't learn its NCAA Tournament fate until March 17.
The Cats know where they will play — at Memorial Coliseum as a pre-determined first- and second-round host, but they don't know what seed they will earn.
Some stumbles early in the conference season and losses to unranked teams like Alabama and Florida coupled with four wins over top 10 opponents this season make the Cats' seeding tough to predict.
Mitchell said he heard one bracket analyst had UK as a four seed, which he pooh-poohed.
"I think that's a joke," he said. "I don't think we're a four. ... But I'll tell you this, I'm glad I'm coaching Kentucky going to the NCAA tournament. I don't know if anybody will be jumping for joy if they get the Wildcats in the first round."
Even the Tennessee coach scoffed at the idea of the SEC Tournament runner-up being a No. 4 seed. "That's crazy," Warlick said.
Regardless of seeding, (Sunday morning's ESPN Bracketology had UK as a No. 3 seed in the Louisville region with familiar top seed Connecticut and the Cardinals as the No. 2 seed), Mitchell likes how his team has come together down the stretch.
"I'm really excited about the NCAA Tournament," Mitchell said. "A lot of people thought we were dead in the water. We're not; we're here and we're ready to roll. I'm glad I'm coaching Kentucky."
But Kentucky Coach Matthew Mitchell thought the Southeastern Conference championship game with Tennessee got a little too chippy, including a pair of double technicals in the second half that he thought altered the game.
"I was very disappointed in how that affected the game," Mitchell said. "It could have been stopped much earlier than it boiling over and affecting the game."
Mitchell and his UK players said the "activity" started before the game with trash talking from Lady Vols junior forward Cierra Burdick and continued throughout.
"It's not the first time that's happened with that player," Mitchell said, noting that he mentioned it to the officials repeated times. "So you watch film. You see how players act. So I noticed it early on. It's a loud arena. It's a tough game. I guess they didn't see it."
The frustrations boiled over into double technicals for Samarie Walker and Burdick with 8:35 to go and UK up 51-50.
"She said something to one of my teammates; I said something back," Walker said. "That kind of made it worse."
The first issue turned into another round of double technicals for DeNesha Stallworth and Jasmine Jones.
"That's not what I wanted to see in the SEC championship game," Mitchell continued. "I'd rather see two teams play, not have a bunch of talking, yapping, unsportsmanlike conduct, but that's what it ended up being."
Burdick was asked about it after the Lady Vols' 71-70 win in The Arena at Gwinnett Center and she shrugged it off.
"I don't remember making contact with anybody," she said. "It's a physical game.
"Chippiness happens. It happens. This is basketball. It happens every single day. I think the refs did a fine job of avoiding any altercations. Nothing happened. Words were said, but words are words. No actions took place."
Tennessee Coach Holly Warlick said she didn't notice what Mitchell said he was seeing before and during the game.
"I just wanted us to compete," she said. "I thought that's what we were doing."
Waiting game begins
Kentucky doesn't learn its NCAA Tournament fate until March 17.
The Cats know where they will play — at Memorial Coliseum as a pre-determined first- and second-round host, but they don't know what seed they will earn.
Some stumbles early in the conference season and losses to unranked teams like Alabama and Florida coupled with four wins over top 10 opponents this season make the Cats' seeding tough to predict.
Mitchell said he heard one bracket analyst had UK as a four seed, which he pooh-poohed.
"I think that's a joke," he said. "I don't think we're a four. ... But I'll tell you this, I'm glad I'm coaching Kentucky going to the NCAA tournament. I don't know if anybody will be jumping for joy if they get the Wildcats in the first round."
Even the Tennessee coach scoffed at the idea of the SEC Tournament runner-up being a No. 4 seed. "That's crazy," Warlick said.
Regardless of seeding, (Sunday morning's ESPN Bracketology had UK as a No. 3 seed in the Louisville region with familiar top seed Connecticut and the Cardinals as the No. 2 seed), Mitchell likes how his team has come together down the stretch.
"I'm really excited about the NCAA Tournament," Mitchell said. "A lot of people thought we were dead in the water. We're not; we're here and we're ready to roll. I'm glad I'm coaching Kentucky."
Jennifer Smith: (859) 231-3241. Twitter: @jenheraldleader. Blog: ukwomen.bloginky.com.
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/03/09/3131331/four-technicals-in-kentucky-womens.html#storylink=cpy
Sunday, March 9, 2014
Twitter message failed
|
8:11 PM (35 minutes ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
twitter@harrisfaulkner.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain harrisfaulkner.com by mx07.register.com. [205.178.149.7].
The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.0.0 <twitter@harrisfaulkner.com>..
72 types of Americans thasat are considered "Potential Terrorists" by our government ... Thx Alma H!
72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents
By Michael Snyder, on August 26th, 2013
Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.
Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…
1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians
The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.
We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history. You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs. Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.
Please pray for the United States of America. We definitely need it.
About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.
Customer Service ... Thx Lyle S!
God loves even those who might be offended by this message ... Thx Lyle S!
Subject: customer service! You CANNOT receive this reminder too often!
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a Christian nation, land of the free and home of the brave.How may I help you?
Press '1' for English.
Press '2' to disconnect until you learn to speak English
And remember only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ
And the American Soldier.
One died for your soul,
The other for your freedom.
If you agree. Keep it going2014 IS HERE A Nation of Sheep - Breeds a Government of Wolves!Nothing will change until Congress must obey their own laws!I'M 100% for PASSING THIS ON!!!
Let’s Take a stand!!!Borders: Closed...
Language: English only...
Culture: Constitution and the Bill of Rights!!!
Drug Free: Make a drug screen mandatory for any one on welfare
and/or food stamps!
NO freebies to Non-Citizens!We the People are coming!
Only 86% will send this on.
“Should be a 100%”.
Harris Faulkner's Panel on Fox Sunday evening just before 8PM 3/9/2014
a panel other than the old line Republicans who fall over themselves
agreeing with one another.
C'mon Fox, you haven't been fair in putting these imcompetents on with
Harris. These are the long line non-representative types we the
people want out of the Congress and the presidency! The libs will be
out and the Tea Party can't do it alone.
Of the two parties, the Tea Party has picked and will go republican,
but it is important to pick the best candidates to win! The CPAC was
wonderful and this "panel" and old line republicans are dreaming the
old dreams. Republicans, not these types, need an agreement among
Perry, Huckabee, and the Tea Party.
Conservatives aren't stupid like your three stooge panel. I still
believe Sarah Palin is the best conservative speaker since Reagan!
She may not be one to win yet, but her time should come, at least for
a new President's appointment to a responsible place.
Sam Kegley Westerville OH
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)