When
a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to
happen is they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers
must find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would
be eliminated as well.
Wall street and the media
normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of "tough decision",
and the board of directors gives upper corporate management big bonuses.
Our government should not be immune from similar
risks.
Therefore:
Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members.
Reduce Senate members from 100 to 50(one per State). Then, reduce their remaining staff by 25%.
Accomplish this over the next 8 years (two steps/two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.
Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:
$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay/member/ yr.)
$437,100,000 for
elimination of their staff. (Estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each
member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the
Senate every year)
$108,350,000 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.
$7,500,000,000reduction
in pork barrel earmarks each year. (Those members whose jobs are gone.
Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion/yr).
The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and improve efficiencies. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country!
We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.
Congress
has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when
the current number of representatives was established. (Telephone,
computers, cell phones to name a few)
Note:
Congress
does not hesitate to head home for extended weekends, holidays and
recesses, when what the nation needs is a real fix for economic
problems. Also, we had 3 senators who were
not doing their jobs for the 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and
still they all accepted full pay. Minnesota survived very well with only
one senator for the first half of this year. These facts alone support a
reduction in senators and congress.
Summary ofopportunity:
$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.
$282,100,000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.
$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.
$70,850,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.
$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.
$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.
$8,084,558,400 per year, estimated total savings. (That's 8-BILLION just to start!)
Corporate America does these types of cuts all the time.
There's even a name for it.
"Downsizing."
------------------------------
Also,
if Members of Congress were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like
everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, taxpayers could
save a bundle.
Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term.
----------------------------------------
IF you are happy with how Washington spends our taxes, delete this message.
Otherwise, it's time to "downsize" Congress.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please consider forwarding...
I
have cleaned this e-mail of all other names, By copying and pasting it,
I'm sending it to you in hopes that you will keep it going and keep it
clean. This is something I believe in and I hope you all read it all the
way through.
The 26th amendment (granting the
right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months and 8 days to be
ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971before
computers, before e-mail, before cell phones,
etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land, all because of public pressure.
I'm
asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty
people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In
three days, most people in The United States of America will have the
message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2012
1. Term Limits. 12 years only, one of the possible options below.
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term
and Three Two-Year House terms
2. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.
3. Congress (past , present and future) participates in Social Security...
All
funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security
system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security
system, and Congress participates with the American people.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans
do.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment