Welcome

Welcome to my blog http://www.skegley.blogspot.com/ . CAVEAT LECTOR- Let the reader beware. This is a Christian Conservative blog. It is not meant to offend anyone. Please feel free to ignore this blog, but also feel free to browse and comment on my posts! You may also scroll down to respond to any post.

For Christian American readers of this blog:


I wish to incite all Christians to rise up and take back the United States of America with all of God's manifold blessings. We want the free allowance of the Bible and prayers allowed again in schools, halls of justice, and all governing bodies. We don't seek a theocracy until Jesus returns to earth because all men are weak and power corrupts the very best of them.
We want to be a kinder and gentler people without slavery or condescension to any.

The world seems to be in a time of discontent among the populace. Christians should not fear. God is Love, shown best through Jesus Christ. God is still in control. All Glory to our Creator and to our God!


A favorite quote from my good friend, Jack Plymale, which I appreciate:

"Wars are planned by old men,in council rooms apart. They plan for greater armament, they map the battle chart, but: where sightless eyes stare out, beyond life's vanished joys, I've noticed,somehow, all the dead and mamed are hardly more than boys(Grantland Rice per our mutual friend, Sarah Rapp)."

Thanks Jack!

I must admit that I do not check authenticity of my posts. If anyone can tell me of a non-biased arbitrator, I will attempt to do so more regularly. I know of no such arbitrator for the internet.











Wednesday, September 4, 2013

5 Reasons not to bomb Syria ... Thx Ramey H!



The link below gives a pretty good argument for NOT supplying weapons to the rebels in Syria. Warning!!! This short video is very graphic and not for the weak of heart or stomach. If you are at all squemish, do not look at the video. Reading the text below presents a pretty good argument.

                         HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfHSPLW63Gg
This man makes some good points.  We had better think this problem through before making a sad mistake.

5 Reasons Not To Bomb Syria
John Hawkins
9/3/2013 12:01:00 AM - John Hawkins

Speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go far. -- Teddy Roosevelt

Barack Obama knows that America's military is a big stick, but unfortunately Roosevelt's advice about speaking softly doesn't seem to have stuck.  Because Barack Obama recklessly shot off his mouth about a "red line" in Syria, he's demanding that our nation insert itself into a civil war between terrorist groups, both of which have chemical weapons, to protect his ego.  Happily, the American people recognize what a foolish move this would be.  A Reuters/Ipsos poll shows that only 9% of Americans currently support bombing Syria.  This is why Barack Obama has punted his Syrian War to Congress.  He's hoping that it'll be foolish enough to vote in favor of war to give him the political cover he needs to bomb.  Not only should Congress vote against the war in Syria, if Obama bombs that country anyway, Congress should immediately cut off funds for the war and move to impeach him.  Why?

1) We don't have a son-of-a-b*tch in Syria.  During the Cold War, America used to semi-regularly ally itself with some rather unsavory leaders and groups.  The oft repeated rationale for supporting a dictator in those days was, "He may be a son-of-a-b*tch, but he's our son-of-a-bitch."  In other words, both sides are bad guys, but this bad guy would work with us instead of the Soviets.  In this case, we don't have a dog in the fight.  It's a civil war between two groups that both despise us and will continue to hate us.  Why risk American blood and treasure for people who will hate our guts no matter what we do?

2) Why act as Al-Qaeda's Air Force?  Barack Obama is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but even he should know that Al-Qaeda attacked America on 9/11.  Well now, Bin Laden’s boys are teamed up with the rebels that are fighting Bashar al-Assad.  We just spent a decade killing as many members of Al-Qaeda as humanly possible in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan; so how much sense does it make for Barack Obama to help Al-Qaeda take over Syria by bombing Bashar al-Assad?  Bashar al-Assad may be our enemy, but we should be thrilled he's killing Al-Qaeda and getting more of his terrorist pals in Hezbollah offed in the process.

3) What makes anyone think Obama can pull this off with no repercussions?  What is there in Barack Obama's tenure in the White House that makes anyone think he's likely to handle this well?  The fact that he didn't kill a drone program George W. Bush set up?  Because he was too distracted playing cards with Reggie Love to screw up killing Osama Bin Laden?  Bush essentially won Iraq and Obama screwed up pulling out of that country and has put a hard-earned victory at risk.  He's also on track to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in Afghanistan.  His incompetence got Americans killed in Benghazi, Libya.  In Egypt, Obama helped get rid of a relatively friendly dictator in favor of anti-American, pro-terrorist theocrats who lasted just over a year before they were thrown out of power by an Egyptian public that seems to hate Obama almost as much as the Muslim Brotherhood.  Yet, we now think Obama is going to insert himself into a terrorist-heavy civil war in the Middle East without creating as many problems as he solves?  That's like emptying a box of live spiders in a teenage girl's slumber party and not expecting any screaming.

4) It invites retaliation from Iran and Hezbollah.  Many conservatives believe that if we have a choice between bombing Iran or letting it acquire nuclear weapons, we'd be better off to bomb Iran.  However, that is supposed to be a last resort after every other measure has failed.  Given that Iran and Hezbollah are actively supporting Bashar al-Assad, bombing him means actively opposing both of them in a war.  Could they retaliate against us with terrorist attacks?  That's certainly possible.  Will they go after Israel to get at us?  That's highly likely.  Will Israel respond to those attacks?  Yes, Israel will.  Could this set off a larger regional war?  Again, that's certainly possible.  While Iran and Hezbollah have much more to fear from us than we do from them, you don't walk up and kick a bee hive just because President Prissy Pants has worked himself into a huff.

5) It's not in our national interest to bomb Syria.  Costly though it may have been, it was in our national interest to overthrow the Taliban in Afghanistan over 9/11 and to target an aggressive enemy of America like Saddam Hussein in Iraq.  That being said, had we known in advance how long our troops would be stuck in Iraq, it's highly doubtful that we would have ever invaded.  On the other hand, what's the rationale for bombing the side that's fighting Al-Qaeda in Syria?  Both sides hate America.  Both sides cooperate with terrorists.  If anything, since Al-Qaeda is determined to kill Americans and Assad is not, the current dictator in charge is probably the lesser of two evils.  Moreover, encouraging other nations to join us in imposing harsh sanctions on Syria would be just as effective as bombing when it comes to discouraging the use of WMDs without being as provocative.  So, what argument is left?  Are we supposed to bomb Syria to avoid looking "weak?"  Well, if people have that impression, they can ask Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, and Anwar al-Awlaki what they think about that if they're willing to search through the bowels of hell long enough to find them.

 Now I have had my final say even though I didn't write this piece.

The best argument against a democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. ~~~ Winston Churchill
 

No comments:

Blog Definition

On Line Blog Definition
Google-Blog Definitionblog, short for web log, an online, regularly updated journal or newsletter that is readily accessible to the general public by virtue of being posted on a website.